Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31537085›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral addictions2019

Overcoming the unitary exploration of binge-watching: A cluster analytical approach.

Maèva Flayelle, Pierre Maurage, Laurent Karila, Claus Vögele, Joël Billieux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Understanding the Phenomenon of Binge-Watching-A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. How much online pornography is too much? A comparison of two theoretically distinct assessment scales.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maèva FlayelleAddictive and Compulsive Behaviours Lab (ACB-Lab), Institute for Health and Behaviour,University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette,Luxembourg.
Pierre MaurageLaboratory for Experimental Psychopathology (LEP), Psychological Sciences Research Institute,Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve,Belgium.
Laurent KarilaHôpital Universitaire Paul Brousse, Service d'addictologie,Université Paris Saclay, Equipe d'AccueilUniversité Paris Sud PSYCOMADD, Villejuif,France.
Claus VögeleClinical Psychophysiology Laboratory (CLIPSLAB), Institute for Health and Behaviour,University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette,Luxembourg.
Joël BillieuxAddictive and Compulsive Behaviours Lab (ACB-Lab), Institute for Health and Behaviour,University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette,Luxembourg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsBinge-watching (i.e., watching multiple episodes of a TV series in one session) has recently become standard practice among TV series viewers; this expansion generates concerns regarding the potential negative outcomes associated with this habit. However, the investigation of its psychological correlates remains fragmentary, with few initial studies a priori conceptualizing this behavior as a new addictive disorder. This study explored these psychological correlates using cluster analysis of binge-watching behavior based on three key psychological factors: motivations, impulsivity, and emotional reactivity.

methodsAn online survey was completed by 4,039 TV series viewers. Data were analyzed using hierarchical and non-hierarchical cluster analyses, the validity of the clusters being finally determined through mutual comparisons with a selection of external correlates.

resultsFour clusters were identified: recreational TV series viewers (presenting low involvement in binge-watching), regulated binge-watchers (moderately involved), avid binge-watchers (presenting elevated but non-problematic involvement), and unregulated binge-watchers (presenting potentially problematic involvement associated with negative outcomes). DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsThis study underlines the heterogeneous and multidetermined nature of binge-watching. Our findings suggest that high engagement in binge-watching is distinct from problematic binge-watching, thus reinforcing the notion that conceptualizing binge-watching as an addictive disorder is of low relevance and might actually lead to the overpathologization of this highly popular leisure activity.

Indexed as

Leisure ActivitiesMotion PicturesScreen TimeAdolescentAdultAgedBehavior, AddictiveCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTelevisionYoung Adultaddictive behaviorsbehavioral addictionsbinge-watchingcluster analysisimpulsivityTV series

Identifiers

PMID31537085
PMCPMC7044630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.