ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2019
Gene expression responses of tomato inoculated with Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum.
Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in the Function Roles of Hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA Shikimate/Quinate Hydroxycinnamoyl Transferases: A Key Enzyme Linking Phenylpropanoid Metabolism to Plant Terrestrial Adaptation.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A time-resolved metabolomics study of potato cultivar responses toFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- The Sugar Transporter Gene Family in Colored Calla Lily: Identification, Expression Patterns, and Roles in Soft Rot Disease.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato and the fall armyworm modulate the morpho-physiology and the metabolome of potato plants.PloS one · 2025Article
- Consortia of3 Biotech · 2024Article
- Gene expression responses of tomato inoculated with Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum.MicrobiologyOpen · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Defense responses of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) against attack by Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum (Pcc), the causal agent of soft rot diseases, were studied. The expression of some tomato defense genes were evaluated by real-time PCR quantification analysis, 24 and 72 hr after actively growing tomato plants were inoculated with Pcc. These included: MYB transcriptor factor, ethylene response element-binding protein, suppressor of the G2 allele of Skp1, cytochrome P450, small Sar1 GTPase, hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA:quinate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase, pathogenesis-related protein 1a, endo-1,3-beta-glucanase, chitinase, proteinase inhibitor, defensin, CC-NBS-LRR resistance protein, and phenylalanine ammonia lyase. The results showed dynamic transcriptomic changes, with transcripts exhibiting different expression kinetics at 24 and 72 hr to confer resistance to tomato against Pcc infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.