Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31536528›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Trends in maternal prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and its association with birth and maternal outcomes in California, 2007-2016: A retrospective cohort study.

Anura W G Ratnasiri, Henry C Lee, Satyan Lakshminrusimha, Steven S Parry, Vivi N Arief, Ian H DeLacy, Jo-Shing Yang, Ralph J DiLibero, Julia Logan, Kaye E Basford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Fear of Childbirth Among Pregnant People Facing Anti-Fat Bias.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anura W G RatnasiriBenefits Division, California Department of Health Care Services, Sacramento, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2098-0646
Henry C LeeDivision of Neonatology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Satyan LakshminrusimhaDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, United States of America.
Steven S ParryBenefits Division, California Department of Health Care Services, Sacramento, California, United States of America.
Vivi N AriefSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Ian H DeLacySchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Jo-Shing YangAnesthesia Room ML, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Ralph J DiLiberoBenefits Division, California Department of Health Care Services, Sacramento, California, United States of America.
Julia LoganHealth Plan Administration Division, California Public Employees' Retirement System, Sacramento, California, United States of America.
Kaye E BasfordSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine recent trends in maternal prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and to quantify its association with birth and maternal outcomes.

methodsA population-based retrospective cohort study included resident women with singleton births in the California Birth Statistical Master Files (BSMF) database from 2007 to 2016. There were 4,621,082 women included out of 5,054,968 women registered in the database. 433,886 (8.6%) women were excluded due to invalid or missing information for BMI. Exposures were underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m2), and obese (≥ 30 kg/m2) at the onset of pregnancy. Obesity was subcategorized into class I (30.0-34.9 kg/m2), class II (35.0-39.9 kg/m2), and class III (≥ 40 kg/m2), while adverse outcomes examined were low birth weight (LBW), very low birth weight (VLBW), macrosomic births, preterm birth (PTB), very preterm birth (VPTB), small-for-gestational-age birth (SGA), large-for-gestational-age birth (LGA), and cesarean delivery (CD). Descriptive analysis, simple linear regression, and multivariate logistic regression were performed, and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations were estimated.

resultsOver the ten-year study period, the prevalence of underweight and normal weight women at time of birth declined by 10.6% and 9.7%, respectively, while the prevalence of overweight and obese increased by 4.3% and 22.9%, respectively. VLBW increased significantly with increasing BMI, by 24% in overweight women and by 76% in women with class III obesity from 2007 to 2016. Women with class III obesity also had a significant increase in macrosomic birth (170%) and were more likely to deliver PTB (33%), VPTB (66%), LGA (231%), and CD (208%) than women with a normal BMI. However, obese women were less likely to have SGA infants; underweight women were 51% more likely to have SGA infants than women with a normal BMI.

conclusionsIn California from 2007 to 2016, there was a declining trend in women with prepregnancy normal weight, and a rising trend in overweight and obese women, particularly obesity class III. Both extremes of prepregnancy BMI were associated with an increased incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes; however, the worse outcomes were prominent in those women classified as obese.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexAdultCaliforniaFemaleHumansOverweightPregnancyPregnancy in ObesityPregnancy OutcomePrevalenceRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID31536528
PMCPMC6752764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.