SynthesisPloS one2019
Comparing infiltration rates in soils managed with conventional and alternative farming methods: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global Bias-Aware Synthesis of Meta-Analyses Reveals Agroforestry's Potential for Improving Soil Health.Global change biology · 2026Review
- A changepoint approach to automated estimation of soil moisture drydown parameters from time series data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessment of nature-based solutions for water resource management in agricultural environments: a stakeholders' perspective in Southern Italy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Seasonal soil health dynamics in soy-wheat relay intercropping.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Restoring particulate and mineral-associated organic carbon through regenerative agriculture.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- A comparative study of fifteen cover crop species for orchard soil management: water uptake, root density traits and soil aggregate stability.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Soil-Plant Relationships in Soybean Cultivated under Crop Rotation after 17 Years of No-Tillage and Occasional Chiseling.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Wheat (Triticum aestivum) adaptability evaluation in a semi-arid region of Central Morocco using APSIM model.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The role of soils in the regulation of hazards and extreme events.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021Review
- Large-scale farmer-led experiment demonstrates positive impact of cover crops on multiple soil health indicators.Nature food · 2021Article
- Cropland expansion in the United States produces marginal yields at high costs to wildlife.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Integrating soil health and manure practices to advance sustainability for US dairy farms.Journal of environmental qualityReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying agricultural practices that enhance water cycling is critical, particularly with increased rainfall variability and greater risks of droughts and floods. Soil infiltration rates offer useful insights to water cycling in farming systems because they affect both yields (through soil water availability) and other ecosystem outcomes (such as pollution and flooding from runoff). For example, conventional agricultural practices that leave soils bare and vulnerable to degradation are believed to limit the capacity of soils to quickly absorb and retain water needed for crop growth. Further, it is widely assumed that farming methods such as no-till and cover crops can improve infiltration rates. Despite interest in the impacts of agricultural practices on infiltration rates, this effect has not been systematically quantified across a range of practices. To evaluate how conventional practices affect infiltration rates relative to select alternative practices (no-till, cover crops, crop rotation, introducing perennials, crop and livestock systems), we performed a meta-analysis that included 89 studies with field trials comparing at least one such alternative practice to conventional management. We found that introducing perennials (grasses, agroforestry, managed forestry) or cover crops led to the largest increases in infiltration rates (mean responses of 59.2 ± 20.9% and 34.8 ± 7.7%, respectively). Also, although the overall effect of no-till was non-significant (5.7 ± 9.7%), the practice led to increases in wetter climates and when combined with residue retention. The effect of crop rotation on infiltration rate was non-significant (18.5 ± 13.2%), and studies evaluating impacts of grazing on croplands indicated that this practice reduced infiltration rates (-21.3 ± 14.9%). Findings suggest that practices promoting ground cover and continuous roots, both of which improve soil structure, were most effective at increasing infiltration rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.