Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31535868›Full record

ArticleNano letters2019

Toward Absolute Molecular Numbers in DNA-PAINT.

Johannes Stein, Florian Stehr, Patrick Schueler, Philipp Blumhardt, Florian Schueder, Jonas Mücksch, Ralf Jungmann, Petra Schwille

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nano letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of Docking Strand Design on Spatial Resolution in DNA-Points Accumulation for Imaging in Nanoscale Topography.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cryosectioning-enhanced super-resolution microscopy for single-protein imaging across cells and tissues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Johannes SteinMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry , 82152 Martinsried , Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1335-1120
Florian StehrMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry , 82152 Martinsried , Germany.
Patrick SchuelerMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry , 82152 Martinsried , Germany.
Philipp BlumhardtMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry , 82152 Martinsried , Germany.
Florian SchuederMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry , 82152 Martinsried , Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3412-5066
Jonas MückschMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry , 82152 Martinsried , Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1469-6956
Ralf JungmannMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry , 82152 Martinsried , Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4607-3312
Petra SchwilleMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry , 82152 Martinsried , Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6106-4847

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) has revolutionized optical microscopy, extending resolution down to the level of individual molecules. However, the actual counting of molecules relies on preliminary knowledge of the blinking behavior of individual targets or on a calibration to a reference. In particular for biological applications, great care has to be taken because a plethora of factors influence the quality and applicability of calibration-dependent approaches to count targets in localization clusters particularly in SMLM data obtained from heterogeneous samples. Here, we present localization-based fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (lbFCS) as the first absolute molecular counting approach for DNA-points accumulation for imaging in nanoscale topography (PAINT) microscopy and, to our knowledge, for SMLM in general. We demonstrate that lbFCS overcomes the limitation of previous DNA-PAINT counting and allows the quantification of target molecules independent of the localization cluster density. In accordance with the promising results of our systematic proof-of-principle study on DNA origami structures as idealized targets, lbFCS could potentially also provide quantitative access to more challenging biological targets featuring heterogeneous cluster sizes in the future.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDNAMicroscopy, FluorescenceOptical ImagingSingle Molecule ImagingSpectrometry, FluorescenceDNADNA-PAINTfluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS)molecular countingsingle-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM)super-resolution microscopy

Identifiers

PMID31535868
PMCPMC6856960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.