Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31535737›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2020

Penalized survival models for the analysis of alternating recurrent event data.

Lili Wang, Kevin He, Douglas E Schaubel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lili WangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0003-4276-3930
Kevin HeDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-8354-426X
Douglas E SchaubelDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennslyvania, Philadelphia, Pennslyvania.ORCID 0000-0002-9792-4474

Funding

Survival Analysis Methods for Organ Failure DataR01DK070869 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DOUGLAS EARL SCHAUBEL · 2005 to 2026
$4.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK070869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrent event data are widely encountered in clinical and observational studies. Most methods for recurrent events treat the outcome as a point process and, as such, neglect any associated event duration. This generally leads to a less informative and potentially biased analysis. We propose a joint model for the recurrent event rate (of incidence) and duration. The two processes are linked through a bivariate normal frailty. For example, when the event is hospitalization, we can treat the time to admission and length-of-stay as two alternating recurrent events. In our method, the regression parameters are estimated through a penalized partial likelihood, and the variance-covariance matrix of the frailty is estimated through a recursive estimating formula. Moreover, we develop a likelihood ratio test to assess the dependence between the incidence and duration processes. Simulation results demonstrate that our method provides accurate parameter estimation, with a relatively fast computation time. We illustrate the methods through an analysis of hospitalizations among end-stage renal disease patients.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalSurvival AnalysisBiometryComorbidityComputer SimulationFemaleHospitalizationHumansKidney Failure, ChronicLikelihood FunctionsMaleRecurrenceRenal Dialysisalternating recurrent eventscorrelated frailty modelend-stage renal diseasepenalized partial likelihood

Identifiers

PMID31535737
PMCPMC7080610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.