Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31535686›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2020

Youth Access to Cigarettes Across Seven European Countries: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Paulien A W Nuyts, Rebecca M F Hewer, Mirte A G Kuipers, Vincent Lorant, Adeline Grard, SILNE-R Consortium, Sarah Hill, Amanda Amos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paulien A W NuytsDepartment of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rebecca M F HewerUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Usher Institute for Population Health Sciences and Informatics University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Mirte A G KuipersDepartment of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Vincent LorantInstitute of Health and Society, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Adeline GrardInstitute of Health and Society, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
SILNE-R Consortium
Sarah HillGlobal Health Policy Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Amanda AmosUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Usher Institute for Population Health Sciences and Informatics University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite widespread age-of-sale restrictions on tobacco, adolescents continue to obtain cigarettes and experiment with smoking. This mixed-methods study aimed to understand how European adolescents access cigarettes and how the policy context may influence this process, using a realist evaluation approach. This is the first study to assess access to cigarettes across various European contexts.

methodsA survey of 4104 students was combined with qualitative data from focus groups among 319 adolescents aged 14-19 across seven European countries. Data were synthesized to explore mechanisms via which young people obtain cigarettes despite age-of-sale restrictions.

resultsWhile purchasing cigarettes from supermarkets was widely regarded as difficult, many participants purchased cigarettes from noncompliant retailers (often in smaller shops or cafes). Other contra-mechanisms included circumventing age checks, proxy purchases, and/or social sources. Dominant forms of access differed across the seven contexts, with direct purchases more common where perceived enforcement was low (eg, Belgium) and proxy purchases more important where perceived enforcement of age-of-sale laws was high (eg, Finland). The effectiveness of age-of-sale restrictions in reducing youth access appears to be influenced by a range of contextual factors including retailer compliance, the availability of vending machines, and the specific minimum age-of-sale.

conclusionsOur findings illustrate the relevance of programme theory in understanding the contra-mechanisms that undermine the effectiveness of age-of-sale laws in discouraging youth smoking. Young people's access to cigarettes could be further limited by addressing these contra-mechanisms, including an increase in the legal sales age (particularly in Belgium), banning vending machines, and strengthening enforcement. IMPLICATIONS: Despite widespread implementation of age-of-sale laws, a substantial proportion of minors continue to access cigarettes. Young people use a number of contra-mechanisms to circumvent age-of-sale restrictions. These include accessing cigarettes via social sources, proxy sales or by circumventing age checks. Our findings show that in contexts where perceived enforcement of age-of-sale restrictions is high, young people are more reliant on irregular forms of access such as proxy sales. Young people's access to cigarettes may be further reduced by policy interventions that address these contra-mechanisms-for example, banning vending machines, strengthening enforcement of age-of-sale laws, and increasing the minimum age-of-sale.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAttitude to HealthCommerceEuropeFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco ProductsTobacco SmokingTobacco Use Disorder

Identifiers

PMID31535686
PMCPMC7593358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.