Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31535626›Full record

SynthesisAsian journal of andrology

Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for regenerating peripheral nerves: potential for penile nerve.

Dong-Yi Peng, Amanda B Reed-Maldonado, Gui-Ting Lin, Shu-Jie Xia, Tom F Lue

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Asian journal of andrology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dong-Yi PengKnuppe Molecular Urology Laboratory, Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Amanda B Reed-MaldonadoKnuppe Molecular Urology Laboratory, Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Gui-Ting LinKnuppe Molecular Urology Laboratory, Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Shu-Jie XiaDepartment of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Tom F LueKnuppe Molecular Urology Laboratory, Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USCentral South University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

Therapy for Obesity-associated Stress Urinary IncontinenceR01DK105097 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LUE, TOM F · 2016 to 2019
$2.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK105097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve damage, such as that found after surgery or trauma, is a substantial clinical challenge. Much research continues in attempts to improve outcomes after peripheral nerve damage and to promote nerve repair after injury. In recent years, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) has been studied as a potential method of stimulating peripheral nerve regeneration. In this review, the physiology of peripheral nerve regeneration is reviewed, and the experiments employing LIPUS to improve peripheral nerve regeneration are discussed. Application of LIPUS following nerve surgery may promote nerve regeneration and improve functional outcomes through a variety of proposed mechanisms. These include an increase of neurotrophic factors, Schwann cell (SC) activation, cellular signaling activations, and induction of mitosis. We searched PubMed for articles related to these topics in both in vitro and in vivo animal research models. We found numerous studies, suggesting that LIPUS following nerve surgery promotes nerve regeneration and improves functional outcomes. Based on these findings, LIPUS could be a novel and valuable treatment for nerve injury-induced erectile dysfunction.

Indexed as

Nerve RegenerationAnimalsCell ProliferationCell SurvivalErectile DysfunctionHumansMaleMitosisNerve Growth FactorsPenisPeripheral Nerve InjuriesPudendal NerveSchwann CellsSignal TransductionUltrasonic TherapyUltrasonic WavesNerve Growth Factorsactivationcellular signalinglow-intensity pulsed ultrasoundneurotrophic factorsperipheral nerve regenerationSchwann cells

Identifiers

PMID31535626
PMCPMC7406088
OpenAlexW2973054640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.