Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31535396›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2019

Intrathoracic side-to-side esophagogastrostomy with a linear stapler and barbed suture in robot-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

Fuqiang Wang, Hanlu Zhang, Yu Zheng, Zihao Wang, Yingcai Geng, Yun Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fuqiang WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0017-9560
Hanlu ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yu ZhengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8538-7376
Zihao WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yingcai GengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yun WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Funding

Chengdu City Science and Technology Project of China 0040205301E42National Key Research Project of China 2017YFC0113502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe side-to-side anastomosis was considered a promising approach to create an intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy in the minimally invasive esophagectomy, with advantages over the side-to-end anastomosis with aspects of no need for additional mini-thoracotomy and lower occurrence of stenosis. The hand-sewing anterior aspect of the anastomosis is technically challenging in the thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Here we introduced our initial experience to facilitate this approach by using the surgical robot and barbed suture.

methodsA retrospective study of all patients underwent robot-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with side-to-side esophagogastrostomy from February 2016 to September 2018 was performed. The technical details are described in this paper.

resultsA total of 37 patients (35 male and 2 female, median age of 62.7 years) were successfully treated with completely robot-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. The median total surgical time was 340 minutes including 65 minutes to perform the anastomosis. Median estimated blood loss was 120 mL and the length of hospital stay was 10 days. There was no 90-day mortality. Three patients suffered anastomotic leakage (8.1%,3/37), who were successfully treated without reoperation.

conclusionOur initial results imply that it is technically feasible to perform intrathoracic gastroesophageal anastomosis by taking advantage of a robotic system and knotless suturing.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsSuturesAdenocarcinomaAgedAnastomosis, SurgicalCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineCarcinoma, Small CellCarcinoma, Squamous CellEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLaparoscopyMaleda Vinciesophageal cancer surgeryesophagectomyrobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID31535396
PMCPMC6899854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.