Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31535343›Full record

ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2020

Changes in Autism Nosology: The Social Impact of the Removal of Asperger's Disorder from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5).

Lindsay Katz, Kritika Nayar, Ariana Garagozzo, Christine Schieszler-Ockrassa, Jessica Paxton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lindsay KatzDepartment of Psychology, Roosevelt University, 420 S. Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60601, USA. Lkatz1791@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8708-327X
Kritika NayarDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
Ariana GaragozzoDepartment of Psychology, Roosevelt University, 420 S. Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60601, USA.
Christine Schieszler-OckrassaDepartment of Psychology, Roosevelt University, 420 S. Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60601, USA.
Jessica PaxtonDepartment of Psychology, Roosevelt University, 420 S. Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60601, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the perception of an ASD label compared to Asperger's syndrome or no diagnosis. Seventy-one undergraduates read an adapted vignette (Ohan et al. J Autism Dev Disord 45:3384-3389, 2015) about an undergraduate with ASD, Asperger's Syndrome, or No Diagnosis. Participants also completed questionnaires. More positive ratings emerged for the Asperger's and ASD labels than No Diagnosis in low contact scenarios, particularly when involving greater social versus professional interaction. In contrast, more positive ratings emerged for the Asperger's compared to the ASD and No Diagnosis on high contact items. Ratings between low and high contact items differed only for ASD. Results demonstrate the impact of diagnostic labels across social contexts and support the need for education surrounding changes in nosology.

Indexed as

AttitudeDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersAdultAsperger SyndromeAutistic DisorderChildFemaleHumansMaleStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesASDAsperger’s syndromeAutism spectrum disorderDSM-5Stigma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.