Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31535162›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2019

Flexible modelling of spatial variation in agricultural field trials with the R package INLA.

Maria Lie Selle, Ingelin Steinsland, John M Hickey, Gregor Gorjanc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Improved bivariate analysis of canola survivability against blackleg disease.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Diversity and Agronomic Performance ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria Lie SelleDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway. maria.selle@ntnu.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2062-3235
Ingelin SteinslandDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
John M HickeyThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Edinburgh, UK.
Gregor GorjancThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

The Research Council of Norway 250362The UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L020467/1The UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/30002275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageEstablished spatial models improve the analysis of agricultural field trials with or without genomic data and can be fitted with the open-source R package INLA. The objective of this paper was to fit different established spatial models for analysing agricultural field trials using the open-source R package INLA. Spatial variation is common in field trials, and accounting for it increases the accuracy of estimated genetic effects. However, this is still hindered by the lack of available software implementations. We compare some established spatial models and show possibilities for flexible modelling with respect to field trial design and joint modelling over multiple years and locations. We use a Bayesian framework and for statistical inference the integrated nested Laplace approximations (INLA) implemented in the R package INLA. The spatial models we use are the well-known independent row and column effects, separable first-order autoregressive ([Formula: see text]) models and a Gaussian random field (Matérn) model that is approximated via the stochastic partial differential equation approach. The Matérn model can accommodate flexible field trial designs and yields interpretable parameters. We test the models in a simulation study imitating a wheat breeding programme with different levels of spatial variation, with and without genome-wide markers and with combining data over two locations, modelling spatial and genetic effects jointly. The results show comparable predictive performance for both the [Formula: see text] and the Matérn models. We also present an example of fitting the models to a real wheat breeding data and simulated tree breeding data with the Nelder wheel design to show the flexibility of the Matérn model and the R package INLA.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationPlant BreedingSpatial AnalysisBayes TheoremCrops, AgriculturalModels, StatisticalSoftwareTriticum

Identifiers

PMID31535162
PMCPMC6820601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.