ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2019
Flexible modelling of spatial variation in agricultural field trials with the R package INLA.
Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Flexible Method for Genomics-Based Quantitative Genetics in Wild Study Systems-A Case Study on a House Sparrow Meta-Population.Evolutionary applications · 2026Article
- Spatial modelling improves genomic evaluation in Tanzanian smallholder admixed dairy cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Improved bivariate analysis of canola survivability against blackleg disease.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Article
- Validation of cross-progeny variance genomic prediction using simulations and experimental data in winter elite bread wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024Article
- Article
- Complex traits and candidate genes: estimation of genetic variance components across multiple genetic architectures.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Spatial modelling of agro-ecologically significant grassland species using the INLA-SPDE approach.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Spatial Regression Models for Field Trials: A Comparative Study and New Ideas.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Diversity and Agronomic Performance ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Article
- Robust modeling of additive and nonadditive variation with intuitive inclusion of expert knowledge.Genetics · 2021Article
- Accounting for spatial trends in multi-environment diallel analysis in maize breeding.PloS one · 2021Article
- Spatial modelling improves genetic evaluation in smallholder breeding programs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
key messageEstablished spatial models improve the analysis of agricultural field trials with or without genomic data and can be fitted with the open-source R package INLA. The objective of this paper was to fit different established spatial models for analysing agricultural field trials using the open-source R package INLA. Spatial variation is common in field trials, and accounting for it increases the accuracy of estimated genetic effects. However, this is still hindered by the lack of available software implementations. We compare some established spatial models and show possibilities for flexible modelling with respect to field trial design and joint modelling over multiple years and locations. We use a Bayesian framework and for statistical inference the integrated nested Laplace approximations (INLA) implemented in the R package INLA. The spatial models we use are the well-known independent row and column effects, separable first-order autoregressive ([Formula: see text]) models and a Gaussian random field (Matérn) model that is approximated via the stochastic partial differential equation approach. The Matérn model can accommodate flexible field trial designs and yields interpretable parameters. We test the models in a simulation study imitating a wheat breeding programme with different levels of spatial variation, with and without genome-wide markers and with combining data over two locations, modelling spatial and genetic effects jointly. The results show comparable predictive performance for both the [Formula: see text] and the Matérn models. We also present an example of fitting the models to a real wheat breeding data and simulated tree breeding data with the Nelder wheel design to show the flexibility of the Matérn model and the R package INLA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.