ArticleScience advances2019
Article in Science advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Re-evaluating molecular clock maximum age calibrations revives pre-Ediacaran divergence estimates for animals.Science advances · 2026Article
- Polychaete annelids from the earliest Cambrian Period.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- An Increase in Animal Diversity was Facilitated by Ecologically-Driven Brain Complexity Throughout the Cambrian.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Exotic cuticular specializations in a Cambrian scalidophoran.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Preservation and early evolution of scalidophoran ventral nerve cord.Science advances · 2025Article
- A burrowing annelid from the early Cambrian.Biology letters · 2024Article
- New fossil ofRoyal Society open science · 2024Article
- Article
- Phylogenetic tracing of midbrain-specific regulatory sequences suggests single origin of eubilaterian brains.Science advances · 2023Article
- First record of growth patterns in a Cambrian annelid.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- The Cambrian cirratuliformProceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Internal anatomy of a fossilized embryonic stage of the Cambrian-Ordovician scalidophoranRoyal Society open science · 2022Article
- Ultrastructure of cerebral eyes in Oweniidae and Chaetopteridae (Annelida) - implications for the evolution of eyes in Annelida.Zoological letters · 2022Article
- Neuroanatomy in a middle Cambrian mollisoniid and the ancestral nervous system organization of chelicerates.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Cambrian comb jellies from Utah illuminate the early evolution of nervous and sensory systems in ctenophores.iScience · 2021Article
- Article
- Proclivity of nervous system preservation in Cambrian Burgess Shale-type deposits.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Annelid worms are a disparate, primitively segmented clade of bilaterians that first appear during the early Cambrian Period. Reconstructing their early evolution is complicated by the extreme morphological diversity in early diverging lineages, rapid diversification, and sparse fossil record.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.