Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31535009›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2019

Progression of Emergency Medicine Resident Patient Experience Scores by Level of Training.

Laura E Walker, James E Colletti, M Fernanda Bellolio, David M Nestler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura E WalkerMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1127-327X
James E CollettiMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
M Fernanda BellolioMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
David M NestlerMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient satisfaction surveys are vital to measuring a patient's experience of care. How scores of patients managed by emergency medicine (EM) residents change as residents progress through training is not known.

objectivesTo evaluate whether EM residents' patient satisfaction scores improve as residency training progresses, similar to clinical skill improvement.

methodsA retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated the correlation of patient satisfaction scores with EM resident year of training from 2015 through 2017. We evaluated for a change in score over time for the 4 "physician questions" and the "overall" score.

resultsWe evaluated 1684 Press Ganey surveys linked to 40 EM resident physicians during the study period. The mean top box scores for the 4 physician questions (concern for comfort [

conclusionWe did not observe a difference in EM residents' patient experience scores as their level of training progressed. Comprehensive patient experience training for residents might be needed.

Indexed as

communicationemergency medicineHCAHPSmedical educationpatient/relationship-centered skillspatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID31535009
PMCPMC6739686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.