ArticleBioNanoScience2019
Differential sensitivity of various markers of platelet activation with adenosine diphosphate.
Article in BioNanoScience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Biomarkers for In Vitro Thrombogenicity Assessment of Medical Device Materials.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A number of techniques have been available to assess platelet activation, but their relative sensitivity is unknown and their usage is variable and not based on any rational criteria. Here, we compared the ability of several techniques based on morphological and biochemical markers to detect the first signs of ADP-induced platelet activation. Scanning electron microscopy of platelets was performed in parallel with flow cytometry to quantify the surface expression of P-selectin (marked by labeled anti-CD62P antibodies), active αIIbβ3-intergrin (assessed by the binding of labeled fibrinogen) and phosphatidylserine (assessed by the binding of labeled Annexin V). When expressed as a fraction of activated platelets, shape changes were the most sensitive to a low ADP concentration compared to the biochemical markers in the following order of sensitivity: morphological changes>fibrinogen binding capacity>P-selectin expression> phosphatidylserine exposure. These results suggest the greater sensitivity of platelet microscopy and the importance of its combination with flow cytometry used to detect surface expression of the molecular markers of platelet activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31534882PMC6750022What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.