Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31534854›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Winter bird-window collisions: mitigation success, risk factors, and implementation challenges.

Barbara B Brown, Erika Kusakabe, Angelo Antonopoulos, Sarah Siddoway, Lisa Thompson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. "Flora of Russia" on iNaturalist: a dataset.Biodiversity data journal · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Barbara B BrownFamily & Consumer Studies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Erika KusakabeFamily & Consumer Studies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Angelo AntonopoulosFamily & Consumer Studies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Sarah SiddowayFamily & Consumer Studies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Lisa ThompsonNatural History Museum of Utah, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Millions of birds die in bird-window collisions in the United States each year. In specialized test settings, researchers have developed methods to alter window designs to mitigate collisions. However, few published studies provide pretest and posttest evaluations of mitigation treatment areas and untreated control areas on existing buildings. We initially monitored bird-window collisions at a single building on the University of Utah campus in Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, during winter 1 (November 9, 2017-January 2, 2018). We found 15 bird-window collisions, most under a portion of the building with a mirrored façade. To test a mitigation treatment, we installed Feather Friendly® bird deterrent film on part of the mirrored façade after winter 1. The unmitigated areas of the same building served as a control area. We continued monitoring during the following winter 2 (November 15, 2018-January 12, 2019). The treated area collisions declined from seven before mitigation to two after mitigation, a 71% reduction. The control area had eight collisions at both times. Results of a generalized estimating equation yielded a significant area by season interaction effect (

Indexed as

BirdBird-friendly window filmCedar waxwingsCitizen scienceFruiting treesMitigationPreventionReflective windowsWindow collisions/strikes

Identifiers

PMID31534854
PMCPMC6727830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.