Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31534815›Full record

ReviewJournal of sport and health science2019

Walking for health during pregnancy: A literature review and considerations for future research.

Christopher P Connolly, Scott A Conger, Alexander H K Montoye, Mallory R Marshall, Rebecca A Schlaff, Sylvia E Badon, James M Pivarnik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of sport and health science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christopher P ConnollyKinesiology Program, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-1410, USA.
Scott A CongerDepartment of Kinesiology, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, USA.
Alexander H K MontoyeDepartment of Integrative Physiology and Health Science, Alma College, Alma, MI 48801, USA.
Mallory R MarshallDepartment of Kinesiology, Samford University, Birmingham, AL 35229, USA.
Rebecca A SchlaffDepartment of Kinesiology, Saginaw Valley State University, University Center, MI 48710, USA.
Sylvia E BadonDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.
James M PivarnikDepartment of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1034, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Walking is the most commonly chosen type of physical activity (PA) during pregnancy and provides several health benefits to both mother and child. National initiatives have promoted the importance of walking in general, but little emphasis is directed toward pregnant women, the majority of whom are insufficiently active. Pregnant women face a variety of dynamic barriers to a physically active lifestyle, some of which are more commonly experienced during specific times throughout the pregnancy experience. Walking is unique in that it appears resistant to a number of these barriers that limit other types of PA participation, and it can be meaningfully integrated into some transportation and occupational activities when leisure-time options are unavailable. Preliminary intervention work suggests that walking programs can be effectively adopted into a typical pregnancy lifestyle. However, a great deal of work remains to administer successful pregnancy walking interventions, including developing and using validated methods of PA and walking assessment. This narrative review discusses the unique advantages of walking during pregnancy, provides recommendations for future intervention work, and outlines the need for pregnancy-focused community walking initiatives. Standard search procedures were followed to determine sources from the literature specific to walking during pregnancy for use in each section of this review.

Indexed as

Ambulatory activityExercise behaviorMaternal-fetal healthPregnant women

Identifiers

PMID31534815
PMCPMC6742678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.