Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31534587›Full record

ReviewCanadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC

Barriers to a full scope of pharmacy practice in primary care: A systematic review of pharmacists' access to laboratory testing.

Jacqueline Donovan, Ross T Tsuyuki, Yazid N Al Hamarneh, Beata Bajorek

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Professional identity formation: A shared responsibility for academia and pharmacists.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
  9. Article
  10. There should only be one most responsible provider.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
  11. Community pharmacist identification of chronic kidney disease using point-of-care technology: A pilot study.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jacqueline DonovanGraduate School of Health (Pharmacy) (Donovan, Bajorek), The University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1774-1625
Ross T TsuyukiGraduate School of Health (Pharmacy) (Donovan, Bajorek), The University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, NSW, Australia.
Yazid N Al HamarnehGraduate School of Health (Pharmacy) (Donovan, Bajorek), The University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3984-3542
Beata BajorekGraduate School of Health (Pharmacy) (Donovan, Bajorek), The University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, NSW, Australia.
University of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe primary care pharmacists' current scope of practice in relation to laboratory testing.

methodA 2-tiered search of key databases (PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE) and grey literature with the following MeSH headings:

resultsThere is limited literature exploring primary care pharmacists' scope of practice in relation to laboratory testing. The majority of literature is from the United States and Canada, with some from the United Kingdom and New Zealand and none from Australia. Overall, there is a difference in regulations between and within these countries, with the key difference being whether pharmacists access and/or order laboratory testing dependently or independently. Canadian pharmacists can access and/or order laboratory tests independently or dependently, depending on the province they practise in. US pharmacists can access and/or order laboratory tests dependently within collaborative practice agreements. In the United Kingdom, laboratory testing can be performed by independent prescribing pharmacists or dependently by supplementary prescribing pharmacists. New Zealand prescribing pharmacists can order laboratory testing independently. Most publications do not report on the types of laboratory tests used by pharmacists, but those that do predominantly resulted in positive patient outcomes. DISCUSSION/

conclusionPrimary care pharmacists' scope of practice in laboratory testing is presently limited to certain jurisdictions and is often performed in a dependent fashion. As such, a full scope of pharmacy services is almost entirely unavailable to patients in the United States, the United Kingdom, New Zealand and Australia. Just as in the case for pharmacists prescribing, evidence indicates better patient outcomes when pharmacists can access/order laboratory tests, but more research needs to be done alongside the implementation of local guidelines and practice standards for pharmacists who practise in that realm. Patients around the world deserve to receive a full scope of pharmacists' practice, and lack of access to laboratory testing is one of the major obstacles to this.

Identifiers

PMID31534587
PMCPMC6739653
OpenAlexW2965977448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.