Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31534323›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2019

End-of-life care in individuals with respiratory diseases: a population study comparing the dying experience between those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancer.

Tetyana Kendzerska, Jason W Nickerson, Amy T Hsu, Andrea S Gershon, Robert Talarico, Sunita Mulpuru, Smita Pakhale, Peter Tanuseputro

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  7. What drives requests for MAiD?CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tetyana KendzerskaDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5301-1796
Jason W NickersonBruyère Research Institute , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Amy T HsuDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Andrea S GershonDepartment of Medicine, the Sunnybrook Health Science Center/ICES , Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0246-594X
Robert TalaricoDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sunita MulpuruDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Smita PakhaleDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Peter TanuseputroDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Among individuals with COPD and/or lung cancer, to describe end-of-life health service utilization, costs, and place of death; to identify predictors of home palliative care use, and to assess benefits associated with palliative care use. Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective population-based study using provincial linked health administrative data (Ontario, Canada) between 2010 and 2015. We examined health care use in the last 90 days of life in adults 35 years and older with physician-diagnosed COPD and/or lung cancer identified using a validated algorithm and the Ontario Cancer Registry, respectively. Four mutually exclusive groups were considered: (i) COPD only, (ii) lung cancer only, (iii) COPD and lung cancer, and (iv) neither COPD nor lung cancer. Multivariable generalized linear models were employed. Results: Of 445,488 eligible deaths, 34% had COPD only, 4% had lung cancer only, 5% had both and 57% had neither. Individuals with COPD only received less palliative care (20% vs 57%) than those with lung cancer only. After adjustment, people with lung cancer only were far more likely to receive palliative care (OR=4.22, 4.08-4.37) compared to those with neither diagnosis, while individuals with COPD only were less likely to receive palliative care (OR=0.82, 0.81-0.84). Home palliative care use was associated with reduced death and fewer days in acute care, and less cost, regardless of the diagnosis. Conclusion: Although individuals with lung cancer were much more likely to receive palliative care than those with COPD, both populations were underserviced. Results suggest greater involvement of palliative care may improve the dying experience of these populations and reduce costs.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCosts and Cost AnalysisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHome Care ServicesHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPalliative CarePatient Acceptance of Health CarePopulation SurveillancePulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructivechronic obstructivehealth serviceslung neoplasmspalliative carepulmonary disease

Identifiers

PMID31534323
PMCPMC6681558
OpenAlexW2965566910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.