Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31534281›Full record

ArticleTechnometrics : a journal of statistics for the physical, chemical, and engineering sciences2019

Assessing Tuning Parameter Selection Variability in Penalized Regression.

Wenhao Hu, Eric B Laber, Clay Barker, Leonard A Stefanski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technometrics : a journal of statistics for the physical, chemical, and engineering sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wenhao HuDepartment of Statistics, NC State University, Raleigh, NC.
Eric B LaberDepartment of Statistics, NC State University, Raleigh, NC.
Clay BarkerSAS Institute, Cary, NC.
Leonard A StefanskiDepartment of Statistics, NC State University, Raleigh, NC.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Cancer Clinical TrialsP01CA142538 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TSIATIS, ANASTASIOS A · 2010 to 2019
$21.3M
InSPECt: Interactive Surveillance Portal for Evaluating Clinical supportK22LM011430 · NLM · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI MCCOY, ALLISON B · 2013 to 2015
$372k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA142538NLM NIH HHS K22 LM011430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penalized regression methods that perform simultaneous model selection and estimation are ubiquitous in statistical modeling. The use of such methods is often unavoidable as manual inspection of all possible models quickly becomes intractable when there are more than a handful of predictors. However, automated methods usually fail to incorporate domain-knowledge, exploratory analyses, or other factors that might guide a more interactive model-building approach. A hybrid approach is to use penalized regression to identify a set of candidate models and then to use interactive model-building to examine this candidate set more closely. To identify a set of candidate models, we derive point and interval estimators of the probability that each model along a solution path will minimize a given model selection criterion, for example, Akaike information criterion, Bayesian information criterion (AIC, BIC), etc., conditional on the observed solution path. Then models with a high probability of selection are considered for further examination. Thus, the proposed methodology attempts to strike a balance between algorithmic modeling approaches that are computationally efficient but fail to incorporate expert knowledge, and interactive modeling approaches that are labor intensive but informed by experience, intuition, and domain knowledge. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Indexed as

Conditional distributionLassoPrediction sets

Identifiers

PMID31534281
PMCPMC6750234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.