Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31534165›Full record

ArticleCell death & disease2019

ER stress and UPR activation in glioblastoma: identification of a noncanonical PERK mechanism regulating GBM stem cells through SOX2 modulation.

Natalia M Peñaranda-Fajardo, Coby Meijer, Yuanke Liang, Bianca M Dijkstra, Raul Aguirre-Gamboa, Wilfred F A den Dunnen, Frank A E Kruyt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death & disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natalia M Peñaranda-FajardoDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Coby MeijerDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Yuanke LiangDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Bianca M DijkstraDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Raul Aguirre-GamboaDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2505-3574
Wilfred F A den DunnenDepartment of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Frank A E KruytDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands. f.a.e.kruyt@umcg.nl.
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with aggressive brain tumors, named glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), have a poor prognoses. Here we explored if the ER stress/unfolded protein response (UPR) is involved in the pathophysiology of GBM and may provide novel therapeutic targets. Immunohistochemical analyses of a tissue microarray containing primary GBM specimens showed strong variability in expression of the UPR markers GRP78/BiP, XBP1, and ATF4. Interestingly, high ATF4 expression was associated with poor overall survival suggesting involvement of PERK signaling in GBM progression. In vitro experiments using patient-derived neurospheres, enriched for GBM stem cells (GSCs), showed high sensitivity for the ER stressor thapsigargin (Tg) mainly via PERK signaling. In contrast, neurospheres-derived differentiated GBM cells were less sensitive likely due to lower UPR activity as indicated by comparative transcriptional profiling. Tg and Tunicamycin strongly reduced neurosphere forming ability of GSCs that was linked with potent PERK-dependent downregulation of SOX2 protein. Interestingly, SOX2 downregulation occurred directly via PERK, not requiring downstream activation of the PERK-UPR pathway. Moreover, PERK inactivation resulted in aberrant serum-induced differentiation of GBM neurospheres accompanied by persistent SOX2 expression, delayed upregulation of GFAP and reduced cell adherence. In conclusion, we provide evidence that PERK signaling contributes to the prognoses of primary GBM patients and identified PERK as a novel regulator of SOX2 expression and GSC differentiation. The role of PERK appeared to be pleiotropic involving UPR-dependent, as well as novel identified noncanonical mechanisms regulating SOX2. ER stress and PERK modulation appear to provide promising therapeutic targets for therapy in GBM.

Indexed as

Endoplasmic Reticulum StressAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsCell DifferentiationeIF-2 KinaseEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPGlioblastomaHumansMiddle AgedNeoplastic Stem CellsSignal TransductionSOXB1 Transcription FactorsUnfolded Protein ResponseEIF2AK3 protein, humaneIF-2 KinaseEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPHSPA5 protein, humanSOX2 protein, humanSOXB1 Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID31534165
PMCPMC6751174
OpenAlexW2973505904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.