Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31534146›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Conventional and organic soil management as divergent drivers of resident and active fractions of major soil food web constituents.

Paula Harkes, Afnan K A Suleiman, Sven J J van den Elsen, Johannes J de Haan, Martijn Holterman, Eiko E Kuramae, Johannes Helder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effects of Abiotic Stress on Soil Microbiome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Pea (Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Shifts in the Active Rhizobiome Paralleling LowFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paula HarkesLaboratory of Nematology, Dept. Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3347-9698
Afnan K A SuleimanDepartment Microbial Ecology, Droevendaalsesteeg 10, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Sven J J van den ElsenLaboratory of Nematology, Dept. Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Johannes J de HaanWageningen University & Research Open Teelten, Edelhertweg 10, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Martijn HoltermanLaboratory of Nematology, Dept. Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Eiko E KuramaeDepartment Microbial Ecology, Droevendaalsesteeg 10, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6701-8668
Johannes HelderLaboratory of Nematology, Dept. Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Hans.Helder@wur.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional agricultural production systems, typified by large inputs of mineral fertilizers and pesticides, reduce soil biodiversity and may negatively affect ecosystem services such as carbon fixation, nutrient cycling and disease suppressiveness. Organic soil management is thought to contribute to a more diverse and stable soil food web, but data detailing this effect are sparse and fragmented. We set out to map both the resident (rDNA) and the active (rRNA) fractions of bacterial, fungal, protozoan and metazoan communities under various soil management regimes in two distinct soil types with barley as the main crop. Contrasts between resident and active communities explained 22%, 14%, 21% and 25% of the variance within the bacterial, fungal, protozoan, and metazoan communities. As the active fractions of organismal groups define the actual ecological functioning of soils, our findings underline the relevance of characterizing both resident and active pools. All four major organismal groups were affected by soil management (p < 0.01), and most taxa showed both an increased presence and an enlarged activity under the organic regime. Hence, a prolonged organic soil management not only impacts the primary decomposers, bacteria and fungi, but also major representatives of the next trophic level, protists and metazoa.

Indexed as

AgricultureBacteriaBiodiversityCarbon CycleEcosystemEukaryotaFertilizersFood ChainFungiSoilSoil MicrobiologyFertilizersSoil

Identifiers

PMID31534146
PMCPMC6751164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.