Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31533867›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2019

Psychological screening of adults and young people following the Manchester Arena incident.

Paul French, Alan Barrett, Kate Allsopp, Richard Williams, Chris R Brewin, Daniel Hind, Rebecca Sutton, John Stancombe, Prathiba Chitsabesan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paul FrenchClinical Researcher, Research and Innovation Department, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester; and Faculty of Health, Psychology and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4300-387X
Alan BarrettConsultant Clinical Psychologist, Clinical Lead Manchester Resilience Hub, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust; and School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, UK.
Kate AllsoppResearch Associate, Complex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK.
Richard WilliamsEmeritus Professor of Mental Health Strategy, Welsh Institute for Health and Social Care, University of South Wales, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1230-0222
Chris R BrewinProfessor of Clinical Psychology, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7462-4460
Daniel HindReader in Complex Interventions, School of Health and Related Research, UK.
Rebecca SuttonResearch Assistant, Greater Manchester Mental Health Care, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
John StancombeClinical Psychologist, Young People's Mental Health Research Unit, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Prathiba ChitsabesanChild and Adolescent Psychiatrist, Young People's Mental Health Research Unit, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust; and Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTerrorist attacks have increased globally since the late 1990s with clear evidence of psychological distress across both adults and children and young people (CYP). After the Manchester Arena terrorist attack, the Resilience Hub was established to identify people in need of psychological and psychosocial support.

aimsTo examine the severity of symptoms and impact of the programme.

methodThe hub offers outreach, screening, clinical telephone triage and facilitation to access evidenced treatments. People were screened for trauma, depression, generalised anxiety and functioning who registered at 3, 6 and 9 months post-incident. Baseline scores were compared between screening groups (first screen at 3, 6 or 9 months) in each cohort (adult, CYP), and within groups to compare scores at 9 months.

resultsThere were significant differences in adults' baseline scores across screening groups on trauma, depression, anxiety and functioning. There were significant differences in the baseline scores of CYP across screening groups on trauma, depression, generalised anxiety and separation anxiety. Paired samples t-tests demonstrated significant differences between baseline and follow-up scores on all measures for adults in the 3-month screening group, and only depression and functioning measures for adults in the 6-month screening group. Data about CYP in the 3-month screening group, demonstrated significant differences between baseline and follow-up scores on trauma, generalised anxiety and separation anxiety.

conclusionsThese findings suggest people who register earlier are less symptomatic and demonstrate greater improvement across a range of psychological measures. Further longitudinal research is necessary to understand changes over time. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None.

Indexed as

mass casualty incident responseoutreachpsychosocial distressscreen and referTrauma

Identifiers

PMID31533867
PMCPMC6788223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.