ArticleCritical care (London, England)2019
Hemoadsorption with CytoSorb shows a decreased observed versus expected 28-day all-cause mortality in ICU patients with septic shock: a propensity-score-weighted retrospective study.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 106 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Dosing of Extracorporeal Cytokine Removal In Septic Shock (DECRISS): a Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Clinical Trial
A Single-center, Pilot, Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study of Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion With or Without Adsorption in Histologically Evaluated Kidneys Retrieved From Marginal Donors
Who cites it
106 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Hemoadsorption in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a systematic review.Respiratory research · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of CytoSorb®: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Hemoperfusion and blood purification strategies in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review.Artificial organs · 2021Pooled it
- Cytokine hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care sciencePooled it
- Trial
- Review
- Antibiotics and Other Drugs Removal by the CytoSorbAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Effects of CytoSorb in Critically Ill Adult Patients on Vasopressor Support: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Extracorporeal Cytokine Adsorption in Acute Cardiovascular Care: Pathophysiological Insights and Clinical Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- A review of systematic reviews on the CytoSorb® hemadsorption technology in sepsis and septic shock.Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- The "cytokine storm" in infection and sepsis: win the battle but lose the war.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
- The International, Prospective COSMOS (CytOSorb® TreatMent Of Critically Ill PatientS) Registry: Interim Results in Patients with Septic Shock.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
- Sepsis in end-stage liver disease and acute-on-chronic liver failure: pathophysiology, diagnostic challenges, and pharmacological management.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Retrospective evaluation of efficacy of CytoSorbWorld journal of critical care medicine · 2025Article
- Inhibiting TIRAP-mediated inflammatory signaling: A promising therapeutic strategy against sepsis.Biochemical pharmacology · 2025Article
- Knowledge gaps in extracorporeal blood purification: what would be required for its successful application in septic shock?Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- From critical care to organ preservation: the potential role of hemadsorption in transplantation-a narrative review.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2025Review
- Extracorporeal Cytokine Adsorption in Sepsis: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2025Review
46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsInnovative treatment modalities have not yet shown a clinical benefit in patients with septic shock. To reduce severe cytokinaemia, CytoSorb as an add-on to continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) showed promising results in case reports. However, there are no clinical trials investigating outcomes.
methodsIn this investigator-initiated retrospective study, patients with septic shock were treated with CRRT + CytoSorb (n = 67) or CRRT alone (n = 49). The primary outcome was the 28-day all-cause mortality rate. Patients were weighted by stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights (sIPTW) to overcome differences in baseline characteristics.
resultsAt the start of therapy, CytoSorb-treated patients had higher lactate levels (p < 0.001), lower mean arterial pressure (p = 0.007) and higher levels of noradrenaline (p < 0.001) compared to the CRRT group. For CytoSorb, the mean predicted mortality rate based on a SOFA of 13.8 (n = 67) was 75% (95%CI 71-79%), while the actual 28-day mortality rate was 48% (mean difference - 27%, 95%CI - 38 to - 15%, p < 0.001). For CRRT, based on a SOFA of 12.8 (n = 49), the mean predicted versus observed mortality was 68% versus 51% (mean difference - 16.9% [95%CI - 32.6 to - 1.2%, p = 0.035]). By sIPTW analysis, patients treated with CytoSorb had a significantly lower 28-day mortality rate compared to CRRT alone (53% vs. 72%, respectively, p = 0.038). Independent predictors of 28-day mortality in the CytoSorb group were the presence of pneumosepsis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.47, p = 0.029), higher levels of lactate at the start of CytoSorb (aOR 1.15, p = 0.031) and older age (aOR per 10 years 1.67, p = 0.034).
conclusionsCytoSorb was associated with a decreased observed versus expected 28-day all-cause mortality. By IPTW analysis, intervention with CytoSorb may be associated with a decreased all-cause mortality at 28 days compared to CRRT alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.