ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2019
Beyond pros and cons - developing a patient decision aid to cultivate dialog to build relationships: insights from a qualitative study and decision aid development.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02379078 (Impact of an Interprofessional Shared Decision-making and Goal-setting Decision Aid for Patients With Diabetes - A Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of an Interprofessional Shared Decision-making and Goal-setting Decision Aid for Patients With Diabetes - A Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Using an Integrated Framework to Investigate the Facilitators and Barriers of Health Information Technology Implementation in Noncommunicable Disease Management: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- Evaluating health service outcomes of public involvement in health service design in high-income countries: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2021Pooled it
- Integrating shared decision-making into primary care: lessons learned from a multi-centre feasibility randomized controlled trial.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Trial
- Development of a decision aid to support colorectal cancer screening: perspectives of Asians in an endemic urban community-a qualitative research study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Impact of MyDiabetesPlan, a Web-Based Patient Decision Aid on Decisional Conflict, Diabetes Distress, Quality of Life, and Chronic Illness Care in Patients With Diabetes: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Trial
- Clinician Needs and Requirements for a Decision Aid Navigator: Qualitative Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Digital Age Transformation in Patient-Physician Communication: 25-Year Narrative Review (1999-2023).Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Review
- Facilitators and barriers for tuberculosis preventive treatment among patients with latent tuberculosis infection: a qualitative study.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Assessing the sustainability and scalability of a diabetes eHealth innovation: a mixed-methods study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Article
- "It's a mess sometimes": patient perspectives on provider responses to healthcare costs, and how informatics interventions can help support cost-sensitive care decisions.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Shared decision-making in hemodialysis vascular access practice.Kidney international · 2021Review
- Beyond rationality: Expanding the practice of shared decision making in modern medicine.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2021Review
- Measuring the Effects of Sharing Mobile Health Data During Diabetes Consultations: Protocol for a Mixed Method Study.JMIR research protocols · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAn individualized approach using shared decision-making (SDM) and goal setting is a person-centred strategy that may facilitate prioritization of treatment options. SDM has not been adopted extensively in clinical practice. An interprofessional approach to SDM with tools to facilitate patient participation may overcome barriers to SDM use. The aim was to explore decision-making experiences of health professionals and people with diabetes (PwD), then develop an intervention to facilitate interprofessional shared decision-making (IP-SDM) and goal-setting.
methodsThis was a multi-phased study. 1) Feasibility: Using a descriptive qualitative study, individual interviews with primary care physicians, nurses, dietitians, pharmacists, and PwD were conducted. The interviews explored their experiences with SDM and priority-setting, including facilitators and barriers, relevance of a decision aid for priority-setting, and integration of SDM and a decision aid into practice. 2) Development: An evidence-based SDM toolkit was developed, consisting of an online decision aid, MyDiabetesPlan, and implementation tools. MyDiabetesPlan was reviewed by content experts for accuracy and comprehensiveness. Usability assessment was done with 3) heuristic evaluation and 4) user testing, followed by 5) refinement.
resultsSeven PwD and 10 clinicians participated in the interviews. From interviews with PwD, we identified that: (1) approaches to decision-making were diverse and dynamic; (2) a trusting relationship with the clinician and dialog were critical precursors to SDM; and, (3) goal-setting was a dynamic process. From clinicians, we found: (1) complementary (holistic and disease specific) approaches to the complex patient were used; (2) patient-provider agendas for goal-setting were often conflicting; (3) a flexible approach to decision-making was needed; and, (4) conflict could be resolved through SDM. Following usability assessment, we redesigned MyDiabetesPlan to consist of data collection and recommendation stages. Findings were used to finalize a multi-component toolkit and implementation strategy, consisting of MyDiabetesPlan, instructional card and videos, and orientation meetings with participating patients and clinicians.
conclusionsA decision aid can provide information, facilitate clinician-patient dialog and strengthen the therapeutic relationship. Implementation of the decision aid can fit into a model of team care that respects and exemplifies professional identity, and can facilitate intra-team communication.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02379078. Date of Registration: 11 February 2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.