Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31533822›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2019

Deconvolution of transcriptomes and miRNomes by independent component analysis provides insights into biological processes and clinical outcomes of melanoma patients.

Petr V Nazarov, Anke K Wienecke-Baldacchino, Andrei Zinovyev, Urszula Czerwińska, Arnaud Muller, Dorothée Nashan, Gunnar Dittmar, Francisco Azuaje, Stephanie Kreis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Omics in Cutaneous Melanoma.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Integrative approaches for analysis of mRNA and microRNA high-throughput data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Metabolic Traits in Cutaneous Melanoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Petr V NazarovQuantitative Biology Unit, Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), L-1445, Strassen, Luxembourg. petr.nazarov@lih.lu.ORCID 0000-0003-3443-0298
Anke K Wienecke-BaldacchinoLife Sciences Research Unit (LSRU), University of Luxembourg, L-4367, Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Andrei ZinovyevINSERM, U900, F-75005, Paris, France.
Urszula CzerwińskaINSERM, U900, F-75005, Paris, France.
Arnaud MullerQuantitative Biology Unit, Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), L-1445, Strassen, Luxembourg.
Dorothée NashanKlinikum Dortmund GmbH, 44137, Dortmund, Germany.
Gunnar DittmarQuantitative Biology Unit, Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), L-1445, Strassen, Luxembourg.
Francisco AzuajeQuantitative Biology Unit, Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), L-1445, Strassen, Luxembourg.
Stephanie KreisLife Sciences Research Unit (LSRU), University of Luxembourg, L-4367, Belvaux, Luxembourg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe amount of publicly available cancer-related "omics" data is constantly growing and can potentially be used to gain insights into the tumour biology of new cancer patients, their diagnosis and suitable treatment options. However, the integration of different datasets is not straightforward and requires specialized approaches to deal with heterogeneity at technical and biological levels.

methodsHere we present a method that can overcome technical biases, predict clinically relevant outcomes and identify tumour-related biological processes in patients using previously collected large discovery datasets. The approach is based on independent component analysis (ICA) - an unsupervised method of signal deconvolution. We developed parallel consensus ICA that robustly decomposes transcriptomics datasets into expression profiles with minimal mutual dependency.

resultsBy applying the method to a small cohort of primary melanoma and control samples combined with a large discovery melanoma dataset, we demonstrate that our method distinguishes cell-type specific signals from technical biases and allows to predict clinically relevant patient characteristics. We showed the potential of the method to predict cancer subtypes and estimate the activity of key tumour-related processes such as immune response, angiogenesis and cell proliferation. ICA-based risk score was proposed and its connection to patient survival was validated with an independent cohort of patients. Additionally, through integration of components identified for mRNA and miRNA data, the proposed method helped deducing biological functions of miRNAs, which would otherwise not be possible.

conclusionsWe present a method that can be used to map new transcriptomic data from cancer patient samples onto large discovery datasets. The method corrects technical biases, helps characterizing activity of biological processes or cell types in the new samples and provides the prognosis of patient survival.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMicroRNAsPrincipal Component AnalysisSurvival AnalysisMicroRNAsCancerDeconvolutionIndependent component analysisSurvival analysisTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID31533822
PMCPMC6751789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.