ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2019
Individualized treatment with denosumab in children with osteogenesis imperfecta - follow up of a trial cohort.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01799798 (TRANSLATIONAL THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOGENESIS IMPERFECTA - A PILOT TRIAL ON TREATMENT WITH THE RANKL-ANTIBODY DENOSUMAB), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Translational therapy in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta - a pilot trial on treatment with the rankl-antibody denosumab
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Urinary calcium and bone resorption markers during 3 years of denosumab treatment in pediatric osteogenesis imperfecta.JBMR plus · 2025Trial
- Denosumab in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta and a historical control study with alendronate.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Trial
- Safety and Efficacy of Denosumab in Children With Osteogenesis Imperfecta-the First Prospective Comparative Study.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab vs Zoledronic Acid in OI Adults: A Prospective, Open-Label, Randomized Study.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024Trial
- Fracture risk assessment by dual-energy absorptiometry in osteogenesis imperfecta: A systematic review of measurement sites and its predictive value.Bone reports · 2026Review
- Pathogenesis and precision management of osteogenesis imperfecta: from genetic mechanisms to novel therapies.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2026Review
- A systematic literature review of the impact and measurement of mobility impairment in rare bone diseases.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2025Review
- Article
- Bone health: Quality versus quantity.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2024Article
- New Perspectives of Therapies in Osteogenesis Imperfecta-A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Denosumab use in osteogenesis imperfecta: an update on therapeutic approaches.Annals of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism · 2023Article
- Vitamin D and Bone fragility in Individuals with Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Scoping Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Targeting strategies for bone diseases: signaling pathways and clinical studies.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Review
- Classification of osteogenesis imperfecta: Importance for prophylaxis and genetic counseling.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Review
- Denosumab in pediatric bone disorders and the role of RANKL blockade: a narrative review.Translational pediatrics · 2023Review
- Drug Treatment of Low Bone Mass and Other Bone Conditions in Pediatric Patients.Paediatric drugs · 2022Review
- A bedridden young lady with hypophosphatemic rickets treated with denosumab: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2021Article
- Management of primary and secondary osteoporosis in children.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOsteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare disease leading to hereditary bone fragility. Nearly 90% of cases are caused by mutations in the collagen genes COL1A1/A2 (classical OI) leading to multiple fractures, scoliosis, short stature and nonskeletal findings as blue sclera, hypermobility of joints, bone pain and delayed motor function development. Bisphosphonates are used in most moderate and severely affected patients assuming that an increase of bone mineral density might reduce fractures and bone pain in patients with OI. Denosumab as a RANK ligand antibody inhibiting osteoclast maturation has been approved for osteoporosis treatment in adults. First data from small clinical trials promised a high efficacy of Denosumab in children with OI. Aim of this analysis was a retrospective evaluation of an individualized biomarker-associated treatment regime with Denosumab in 10 children with classical OI which were followed for 1 year after their participation in a pilot trial with Denosumab. Therefore urinary deoxypyridinoline levels were evaluated frequently as an osteoclastic activity marker and depending on that levels Denosumab injections were scheduled individually.
methodsTen patients (age range: 6.16-12.13 years; all participated in the former OI-AK phase 2 trial (NCT01799798)) were included in the follow-up period. Denosumab was administered subcutaneously depending on the individual urinary excretion course of deoxypyridinoline (DPD/Crea) as osteoclastic activity marker with 1 mg/kg body weight. DPD/Crea levels were evaluated before denosumab administration and afterwards. If patients present after an initial decrease after injection with a re-increase up to the DPD/crea level before Denosumab injection next dosage was planned. Changes of areal bone mineral density (aBMD) using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine after 12 month was evaluated. Safety was assessed by bone metabolism markers and side effect reporting.
resultsDuring follow-up mean relative change of lumbar aBMD was - 6.4%. Lumbar spine aBMD z-Scores decreased from - 1.01 ± 2.61 (mean ± SD) to - 1.91 ± 2.12 (p = 0.015). Mobility changed not significantly (GMFM-88 -6.49 ± 8.85% (p = 0.08). No severe side effects occurred. Dose intervals could be extended in the mean from 12 weeks previously to 20.3 weeks.
conclusionsOn average, it was possible to prolong the intervals between drug administrations and to reduce the total dose about by 25% without a decrease of mobility or change of vertebral shape despite a reduction of lumbar aBMD during 1 year of biomarker-directed Denosumab treatment. Further trials are necessary to balance side effects and highest efficacy in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.