ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2019
Model-based myocardial T1 mapping with sparsity constraints using single-shot inversion-recovery radial FLASH cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Native myocardial T1 mapping using rapid 1.5T T1FLASH and T1 MOLLI during breath-hold and free-breathing.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Accelerated model-based T1, T2* and proton density mapping using a Bayesian approach with automatic hyperparameter estimation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Fast Whole-Brain MR Multi-Parametric Mapping with Scan-Specific Self-Supervised Networks.ArXiv · 2024Article
- Joint MAPLE: Accelerated joint T1 and T2∗ mapping with scan-specific self-supervised networksMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- The future of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: All-in-one vs. real-time (Part 1).Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024Review
- Simultaneous multislice cardiac multimapping based on locally low-rank and sparsity constraints.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024Article
- Free-breathing myocardial TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Latest Advances in Image Acceleration: All Dimensions are Fair Game.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023Review
- A 3-slice cardiac quantitative native and post-contrast T1 and T2 MRI protocol requiring only four BHs using a 72-channel receive array coil.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Motion-compensated TFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- MaxGIRF: Image reconstruction incorporating concomitant field and gradient impulse response function effects.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- Accelerated model-based quantitative diffusion MRI: A feasibility study for musculoskeletal application.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2022Article
- Rapid MR relaxometry using deep learning: An overview of current techniques and emerging trends.NMR in biomedicine · 2022Review
- Cardiac MR: From Theory to Practice.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Magnetization-prepared GRASP MRI for rapid 3D T1 mapping and fat/water-separated T1 mapping.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- Physics-based reconstruction methods for magnetic resonance imaging.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2021Review
- Model-based reconstruction for simultaneous multi-sliceMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- Respiratory Motion-Registered Isotropic Whole-Heart TFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- Accurate myocardial T1 mapping at 5T using an improved modified Look-Locker inversion recovery method: A validation study.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study develops a model-based myocardial T1 mapping technique with sparsity constraints which employs a single-shot inversion-recovery (IR) radial fast low angle shot (FLASH) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) acquisition. The method should offer high resolution, accuracy, precision and reproducibility.
methodsThe proposed reconstruction estimates myocardial parameter maps directly from undersampled k-space which is continuously measured by IR radial FLASH with a 4 s breathhold and retrospectively sorted based on a cardiac trigger signal. Joint sparsity constraints are imposed on the parameter maps to further improve T1 precision. Validations involved studies of an experimental phantom and 8 healthy adult subjects.
resultsIn comparison to an IR spin-echo reference method, phantom experiments with T1 values ranging from 300 to 1500 ms revealed good accuracy and precision at simulated heart rates between 40 and 100 bpm. In vivo T1 maps achieved better precision and qualitatively better preservation of image features for the proposed method than a real-time CMR approach followed by pixelwise fitting. Apart from good inter-observer reproducibility (0.6% of the mean), in vivo results confirmed good intra-subject reproducibility (1.05% of the mean for intra-scan and 1.17, 1.51% of the means for the two inter-scans, respectively) of the proposed method.
conclusionModel-based reconstructions with sparsity constraints allow for single-shot myocardial T1 maps with high spatial resolution, accuracy, precision and reproducibility within a 4 s breathhold. Clinical trials are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.