Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31533730›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2019

I could take the judgment if you could just provide the service: non-prescription syringe purchase experience at Arizona pharmacies, 2018.

Beth E Meyerson, Carrie A Lawrence, Summer Dawn Cope, Steven Levin, Christopher Thomas, Lori Ann Eldridge, Haley B Coles, Nina Vadiei, Amy Kennedy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Beth E MeyersonSouthwest Institute for Research on Women, University of Arizona, 925 N. Tyndall Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA. bmeyerson@email.arizona.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1762-7179
Carrie A LawrenceRural Center for AIDS/STD Prevention, Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Summer Dawn CopeHarm Reduction and Foster Care Advocate, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Steven LevinSonoran Prevention Works, 3201 N 16th St suite 9, Phoenix, AZ, 85016, USA.
Christopher ThomasSonoran Prevention Works, 3201 N 16th St suite 9, Phoenix, AZ, 85016, USA.
Lori Ann EldridgeRural Center for AIDS/STD Prevention, Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Haley B ColesSonoran Prevention Works, 3201 N 16th St suite 9, Phoenix, AZ, 85016, USA.
Nina VadieiCollege of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, 1295 N. Martin Avenue, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Amy KennedyCollege of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, 1295 N. Martin Avenue, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity pharmacies are important for health access by rural populations and those who do not have optimum access to the health system, because they provide myriad health services and are found in most communities. This includes the sale of non-prescription syringes, a practice that is legal in the USA in all but two states. However, people who inject drugs (PWID) face significant barriers accessing sterile syringes, particularly in states without laws allowing syringe services programming. To our knowledge, no recent studies of pharmacy-based syringe purchase experience have been conducted in communities that are both rural and urban, and none in the Southwestern US. This study seeks to understand the experience of retail pharmacy syringe purchase in Arizona by PWID.

methodsAn interview study was conducted between August and December 2018 with 37 people living in 3 rural and 2 urban Arizona counties who identified as current or former users of injection drugs. Coding was both a priori and emergent, focusing on syringe access through pharmacies, pharmacy experiences generally, experiences of stigma, and recommendations for harm reduction services delivered by pharmacies.

resultsAll participants reported being refused syringe purchase at pharmacies. Six themes emerged about syringe purchase: (1) experience of stigma and judgment by pharmacy staff, (2) feelings of internalized stigma, (3) inconsistent sales outcomes at the same pharmacy or pharmacy chain, (4) pharmacies as last resort for syringes, (5) fear of arrest for syringe possession, and (6) health risks resulting from syringe refusal.

conclusionsNon-prescription syringe sales in community pharmacies are a missed opportunity to improve the health of PWID by reducing syringe sharing and reuse. Yet, current pharmacy syringe sales refusal and stigmatization by staff suggest that pharmacy-level interventions will be necessary to impact pharmacy practice. Lack of access to sterile syringes reinforces health risk behaviors among PWID. Retail syringe sales at pharmacies remain an important, yet barrier-laden, element of a comprehensive public health response to reduce HIV and hepatitis C among PWID. Future studies should test multilevel evidence-based interventions to decrease staff discrimination and stigma and increase syringe sales.

Indexed as

Harm ReductionAdultAgedArizonaFemaleGroup PurchasingHealth Services AccessibilityHepatitis CHIV InfectionsHumansInterview, PsychologicalMaleMiddle AgedNeedle SharingPharmaciesSocial StigmaHepatitis CHIVStigmaSyringe access

Identifiers

PMID31533730
PMCPMC6751644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.