ArticleBMC medical education2019
Implementation of a large-scale simulation-based cardiovascular clinical examination course for undergraduate medical students - a pilot study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04976452 (Identifying Learning Strategies to Improve Blood Pressure Measurement in Physical Therapy Education Programs), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Identifying Learning Strategies to Improve Blood Pressure Measurement in Physical Therapy Education Programs
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of performance and confidence level of simulation based clinical examination of respiratory system in undergraduate medical students of a medical college: a comparative cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Implementation of an on-site simulation programme during COVID-19 and the assessment of its impact on medical students' competence.Irish journal of medical science · 2023Article
- An Alternative to Traditional Bedside Teaching During COVID-19: High-Fidelity Simulation-Based Study.JMIR medical education · 2022Article
- Can cardiac auscultation accuracy be improved with an additional app-based learning tool?The clinical teacher · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe report the implementation of a large-scale simulation-based cardiovascular diagnostics course for undergraduate medical students.
methodsA simulation-based course was integrated into the curriculum of second-year medical students (> 400 students/year). The first session aimed at teaching cardiac auscultation skills on mannequins and the second at teaching blood pressure measurement, peripheral arterial examination, and the clinical examination of heart failure in a technical skill-based manner and in a scenario.
resultsA total of 414 (99.8%) and 402 (98.5%) students, as well as 102 and 104 educators, participated during the 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 academic years across both types of sessions. The number of positive appreciations by students was high and improved from the first to the second year (session 1: 77% vs. 98%, session 2: 89% vs. 98%; p < 0.0001). Similar results were observed for educators (session 1: 84% vs. 98%, p = 0.007; session 2: 82% vs. 98%, p = 0.01). Feedbacks by students were positive regarding the usefulness of the course, fulfillment of pedagogical objectives, quality of the teaching method, time management, and educator-student interactivity. In contrast, 95% of students criticized the quality of the mannequins during the first year leading to the replacement of the simulation material the following year. Students most appreciated the auscultation workshop (25%), the practical aspect of the course (22%), and the availability of educators (21%).
conclusionsDespite the need to commit significant human and material resources, the implementation of this large-scale program involving > 400 students/year was feasible, and students and educators reacted favorably.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.