ArticleBMC health services research2019
A qualitative appraisal of stakeholders' perspectives of a community-based primary health care program in rural Ghana.
Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Linking communities and health facilities to improve child health in low-resource settings: a systematic review.Health policy and planning · 2024Pooled it
- Community-based Health Planning and Services programme in Ghana: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2024Pooled it
- Implementation of the Community-based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) in rural and urban Ghana: a history and systematic review of what works, for whom and why.Frontiers in public health · 2023Pooled it
- Quantifying inequality in the utilization of healthcare services provided by community-based health planning and services and its correlates in selected urban poor communities in Ghana: an analytic cross-sectional study, 2023.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Implementing a peer learning strategy for health systems strengthening in Ghana: a qualitative study.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Context matters: examining factors influencing the implementation of evidence-based family systems care for small and sick newborns across the care continuum.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- Physical and financial access challenges to seeking child healthcare in a rural district in Ghana.PloS one · 2025Article
- Primary health care response to noncommunicable diseases: an assessment of Wellness Clinics in Ghana.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Perspectives and Satisfaction of Consumers with Hypertension and Diabetes on Services Provided by Community Pharmacy.Journal of patient experience · 2024Article
- Work-related challenges and their associated coping mechanisms among female head porters (Kayayei) in Ghana.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Implementing patient-public engagement for improved health: Lessons from three Ghanaian community-based programmes.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Article
- "The trip actually opened our eyes to things that we were supposed to do and we were not doing": developing primary health care system leadership in a low-income country with peer exchanges.Research in health services & regions · 2023Article
- Embedding Research on Implementation of Primary Health Care Systems Strengthening: A Commentary on Collaborative Experiences in Ethiopia, Ghana, and Mozambique.Global health, science and practice · 2022Article
- Social innovations to increase health coverage: evidence from a crowdsourcing contest in Ghana.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Developing organizational learning for scaling-up community-based primary health care in Ghana.Learning health systems · 2022Article
- Institutional mortality rate and cause of death at health facilities in Ghana between 2014 and 2018.PloS one · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Ghana Community-based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) initiative is a national strategy for improving access to primary health care services for underserved communities. Following a successful trial in the North Eastern part of the country, CHPS was adopted as Ghana's flagship programme for achieving the Universal Health Coverage. Recent empirical evidence suggests, however, that scale-up of CHPS has not necessarily replicated the successes of the pilot study. This study examines the community's perspective of the performance of CHPS and how the scale up could potentially align with the original experimental study.
methodApplying a qualitative research methodology, this study analysed transcripts from 20 focus group discussions (FGDs) in four functional CHPS zones in separate districts of the Northern and Volta Regions of Ghana to understand the community's assessment of CHPS. The study employed the thematic analysis to explore the content of the CHPS service provision, delivery and how community members feel about the service. In addition, ordinary least regression model was applied in interpreting 126 scores consigned to CHPS by the study respondents.
resultsTwo broad areas of consensus were observed: general favourable and general unfavourable thematic areas. Favourable themes were informed by approval, appreciation, hard work and recognition of excellent services. The unfavourable thematic area was informed by rudeness, extortion, inappropriate and unprofessional behaviour, lack of basic equipment and disappointments. The findings show that mothers of children under the age of five, adolescent girls without children, and community leaders generally expressed favourable perceptions of CHPS while fathers of children under the age of five and adolescent boys without children had unfavourable expressions about the CHPS program. A narrow focus on maternal and child health explains the demographic divide on the perception of CHPS. The study revealed wide disparities in actual CHPS deliverables and community expectations.
conclusionsA communication gap between health care providers and community members explains the high and unrealistic expectations of CHPS. Efforts to improve program acceptability and impact should address the need for more general outreach to social networks and men rather than a sole focus on facility-based maternal and child health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.