Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31533635›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2019

Health systems readiness to provide geriatric friendly care services in Uganda: a cross-sectional study.

Jude Thaddeus Ssensamba, Moses Mukuru, Mary Nakafeero, Ronald Ssenyonga, Suzanne N Kiwanuka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Unlocking the WHO's Age-Friendly Healthcare Principles: Portugal's Quest and Recommendations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Implementation of the World Health Organization Age-Friendly Principles: A Case Study from Portugal.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  16. Developing a Conceptual Framework for an Age-Friendly Health System: A Scoping Review.International journal of health policy and management · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jude Thaddeus SsensambaMakerere University College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Planning, Kampala, Uganda. Jtssensamba@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3939-4951
Moses MukuruMakerere University College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Planning, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-2139-6679
Mary NakafeeroDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-2943-0744
Ronald SsenyongaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-2409-3593
Suzanne N KiwanukaMakerere University College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Planning, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-4729-4897

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs ageing emerges as the next public health threat in Africa, there is a paucity of information on how prepared its health systems are to provide geriatric friendly care services. In this study, we explored the readiness of Uganda's public health system to offer geriatric friendly care services in Southern Central Uganda.

methodsFour districts with the highest proportion of old persons in Southern Central Uganda were purposively selected, and a cross-section of 18 randomly selected health facilities (HFs) were visited and assessed for availability of critical items deemed important for provision of geriatric friendly services; as derived from World Health Organization's Age-friendly primary health care centres toolkit. Data was collected using an adapted health facility geriatric assessment tool, entered into Epi-data software and analysed using STATA version 14. Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's post hoc tests were conducted to determine any associations between readiness, health facility level, and district.

resultsThe overall readiness index was 16.92 (SD ±4.19) (range 10.8-26.6). This differed across districts; Lwengo 17.91 (SD ±3.15), Rakai 17.63 (SD ±4.55), Bukomansimbi 16.51 (SD ±7.18), Kalungu 13.74 (SD ±2.56) and facility levels; Hospitals 26.62, Health centers four (HCIV) 20.05 and Health centers three (HCIII) 14.80. Low readiness was due to poor scores concerning; leadership (0%), financing (0%), human resources (1.7%) and health management information systems (HMIS) (11.8%) WHO building blocks. Higher-level HFs were statistically significantly friendlier than lower-level HFs (p = 0.015). The difference in readiness between HCIIIs and HCIVs was 2.39 (p = 0.025).

conclusionThere is a low readiness for public health facilities to provide geriatric friendly care services in Uganda. This is due to gaps in all of the health system building blocks. There is a need for health system reforms in Uganda to adequately cater for service provision for older adults if the 2020 global healthy ageing goal is to be met.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareFemaleGeriatricsHealth FacilitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMalePrimary Health CarePublic HealthUgandaWorld Health OrganizationAfricaGeriatric careHealth facility readinesshealth systemsPublic health facilitiesUganda

Identifiers

PMID31533635
PMCPMC6749715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.