Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31533612›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

Automatic discovery of 100-miRNA signature for cancer classification using ensemble feature selection.

Alejandro Lopez-Rincon, Marlet Martinez-Archundia, Gustavo U Martinez-Ruiz, Alexander Schoenhuth, Alberto Tonda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. MIO: microRNA target analysis system for immuno-oncology.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Alejandro Lopez-RinconDivision of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, David de Wied building,Universiteitsweg 99, Utrecht, 3584 CG, The Netherlands. alejandro.lopez@iscpif.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4491-5889
Marlet Martinez-ArchundiaLaboratorio de Modelado Molecular, Bioinformática y diseño de fármacos. Departamento de Posgrado. Escuela Superior de Medicina del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), Mexico City, Mexico.
Gustavo U Martinez-RuizFaculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico; Federico Gomez Children's Hospital of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alexander SchoenhuthLife Sciences and Health, CWI, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Alberto TondaUMR 782 GMPA, Université Paris-Saclay, INRA, AgroParisTech, Thiverval-Grignon, France.
AgroParisTech · FRHospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez · MXInstituto Politécnico Nacional · MXUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicroRNAs (miRNAs) are noncoding RNA molecules heavily involved in human tumors, in which few of them circulating the human body. Finding a tumor-associated signature of miRNA, that is, the minimum miRNA entities to be measured for discriminating both different types of cancer and normal tissues, is of utmost importance. Feature selection techniques applied in machine learning can help however they often provide naive or biased results.

resultsAn ensemble feature selection strategy for miRNA signatures is proposed. miRNAs are chosen based on consensus on feature relevance from high-accuracy classifiers of different typologies. This methodology aims to identify signatures that are considerably more robust and reliable when used in clinically relevant prediction tasks. Using the proposed method, a 100-miRNA signature is identified in a dataset of 8023 samples, extracted from TCGA. When running eight-state-of-the-art classifiers along with the 100-miRNA signature against the original 1046 features, it could be detected that global accuracy differs only by 1.4%. Importantly, this 100-miRNA signature is sufficient to distinguish between tumor and normal tissues. The approach is then compared against other feature selection methods, such as UFS, RFE, EN, LASSO, Genetic Algorithms, and EFS-CLA. The proposed approach provides better accuracy when tested on a 10-fold cross-validation with different classifiers and it is applied to several GEO datasets across different platforms with some classifiers showing more than 90% classification accuracy, which proves its cross-platform applicability.

conclusionsThe 100-miRNA signature is sufficiently stable to provide almost the same classification accuracy as the complete TCGA dataset, and it is further validated on several GEO datasets, across different types of cancer and platforms. Furthermore, a bibliographic analysis confirms that 77 out of the 100 miRNAs in the signature appear in lists of circulating miRNAs used in cancer studies, in stem-loop or mature-sequence form. The remaining 23 miRNAs offer potentially promising avenues for future research.

Indexed as

HumansMachine LearningMicroRNAsNeoplasmsMicroRNAsClassifiersDatasetFeature selectionMachine learningMicroRNAsmiRNA

Identifiers

PMID31533612
PMCPMC6751684
OpenAlexW2974261289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.