ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019
Automatic discovery of 100-miRNA signature for cancer classification using ensemble feature selection.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- miRNAs as biomarkers for early cancer detection and their application in the development of new diagnostic tools.Biomedical engineering online · 2021Pooled it
- MicroRNome analysis generates a blood-based signature for endometriosis.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- Machine learning identifies differences between breast milk and formula in the gut microbiome.Gut microbiome (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
- A systems microbiology framework for reproducible multi-dataset omics integration with application to long COVID.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Ensemble Feature Selection and Nested Cross-Validation for miRNA Biomarker Discovery in Usher Syndrome.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Computational models for pan-cancer classification based on multi-omics data.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Navigating the microarray landscape: a comprehensive review of feature selection techniques and their applications.Frontiers in big data · 2025Review
- Evaluating Feature Selection Methods for Accurate Diagnosis of Diabetic Kidney Disease.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Improved lung cancer classification by employing diverse molecular features of microRNAs.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Methodology for biomarker discovery with reproducibility in microbiome data using machine learning.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- A robust mRNA signature obtained via recursive ensemble feature selection predicts the responsiveness of omalizumab in moderate-to-severe asthma.Clinical and translational allergy · 2023Article
- The Role of MicroRNAs in Breast Cancer and the Challenges of Their Clinical Application.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Review
- Prediction of tissue-of-origin of early stage cancers using serum miRNomes.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2023Article
- Screening microRNAs as potential prognostic biomarkers for lung adenocarcinoma.Annals of medicine · 2023Article
- Addressing the Clinical Feasibility of Adopting Circulating miRNA for Breast Cancer Detection, Monitoring and Management with Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Platforms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Identification of miRNA biomarkers for breast cancer by combining ensemble regularized multinomial logistic regression and Cox regression.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- A Bioinformatics Approach to MicroRNA-Sequencing Analysis Based on Human Saliva Samples of Patients with Endometriosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- MIO: microRNA target analysis system for immuno-oncology.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Discovering Common miRNA Signatures Underlying Female-Specific Cancers via a Machine Learning Approach Driven by the Cancer Hallmark ERBB.Biomedicines · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicroRNAs (miRNAs) are noncoding RNA molecules heavily involved in human tumors, in which few of them circulating the human body. Finding a tumor-associated signature of miRNA, that is, the minimum miRNA entities to be measured for discriminating both different types of cancer and normal tissues, is of utmost importance. Feature selection techniques applied in machine learning can help however they often provide naive or biased results.
resultsAn ensemble feature selection strategy for miRNA signatures is proposed. miRNAs are chosen based on consensus on feature relevance from high-accuracy classifiers of different typologies. This methodology aims to identify signatures that are considerably more robust and reliable when used in clinically relevant prediction tasks. Using the proposed method, a 100-miRNA signature is identified in a dataset of 8023 samples, extracted from TCGA. When running eight-state-of-the-art classifiers along with the 100-miRNA signature against the original 1046 features, it could be detected that global accuracy differs only by 1.4%. Importantly, this 100-miRNA signature is sufficient to distinguish between tumor and normal tissues. The approach is then compared against other feature selection methods, such as UFS, RFE, EN, LASSO, Genetic Algorithms, and EFS-CLA. The proposed approach provides better accuracy when tested on a 10-fold cross-validation with different classifiers and it is applied to several GEO datasets across different platforms with some classifiers showing more than 90% classification accuracy, which proves its cross-platform applicability.
conclusionsThe 100-miRNA signature is sufficiently stable to provide almost the same classification accuracy as the complete TCGA dataset, and it is further validated on several GEO datasets, across different types of cancer and platforms. Furthermore, a bibliographic analysis confirms that 77 out of the 100 miRNAs in the signature appear in lists of circulating miRNAs used in cancer studies, in stem-loop or mature-sequence form. The remaining 23 miRNAs offer potentially promising avenues for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.