ReviewSexual and reproductive health matters2019
Building a transformative agenda for accountability in SRHR: lessons learned from SRHR and accountability literatures.
Review in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Methods to measure effects of social accountability interventions in reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health programs: systematic review and critique.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2020Pooled it
- When accountability meets power: realizing sexual and reproductive health and rights.International journal for equity in health · 2020Pooled it
- Social accountability for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health: A review of reviews.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- Setting research priorities for sexual and reproductive health in humanitarian settings: a global, stakeholder-informed agenda.Conflict and health · 2025Article
- Unmet needs and new challenges in young women's sexual and reproductive health and rights: a qualitative study in Chile's Metropolitan Region.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
- Moving Past a Legacy of Controlling Women: Key Frameworks to Center Women and Girls' Choice and Agency in Sexual and Reproductive Health Measurement.Studies in family planning · 2025Article
- A narrative review of challenges related to healthcare worker rights, roles and responsibilities in the provision of sexual and reproductive services in health facilities.BMJ global health · 2023Review
- Article
- Customers' Perception Towards Accountability of Diagnostic Centres: Evidence from India.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Article
- Using social capital to address youth sexual and reproductive health and rights in disaster preparedness and response: A qualitative study highlighting the strengths of Pacific community organisations and networks.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Level of satisfaction and sexual and reproductive health needs of deaf persons in Ghana: a sequential explanatory mixed method study.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Achieving universal reproductive health coverage for deaf women in Ghana: an explanatory study of knowledge of contraceptive methods, pregnancy and safe abortion practices.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- 'History obligates us to do it': political capabilities of Indigenous grassroots leaders of health accountability initiatives in rural Guatemala.BMJ global health · 2022Article
- Building social accountability to improve reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health in Nigeria.International journal for equity in health · 2022Article
- A summative content analysis of how programmes to improve the right to sexual and reproductive health address power.BMJ global health · 2022Article
- Social accountability as a strategy to promote sexual and reproductive health entitlements for stigmatized issues and populations.International journal for equity in health · 2022Article
- Integrating human rights into sexual and reproductive health research: moving beyond the rhetoric, what will it take to get us there?Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2021Article
- Necessary but not sufficient: a scoping review of legal accountability for sexual and reproductive health in low-income and middle-income countries.BMJ global health · 2021Article
- Unpacking power dynamics in research and evaluation on social accountability for sexual and reproductive health and rights.International journal for equity in health · 2021Article
- Accounting for complexity - Intervention design in the context of studying social accountability for reproductive health.Gates open research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Global strategies and commitments for sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) underscore the need to strengthen rights-based accountability processes. Yet there are gaps between these ambitious SRHR rights frameworks and the constrained socio-political lived realities within which these frameworks are implemented. This paper addresses these gaps by reviewing the evidence on the dynamics and concerns related to operationalising accountability in the context of SRHR. It is based on a secondary analysis of a systematic review that examined the published evidence on SRHR and accountability and also draws on the broader literature on accountability for health. Key themes include the political and ideological context, enhancing community voice and health system responsiveness, and recognising the complexity of health systems. While there is a range of accountability relationships that can be leveraged in the health system, the characteristics specific to SRHR need to be considered as they colour the capabilities and conditions in which accountability efforts occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.