Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31533555›Full record

ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2019

AIDS- and sexuality-related stigmas underlying the use of post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV in Brazil: findings from a multicentric study.

Dulce Ferraz, Marcia Thereza Couto, Eliana Miura Zucchi, Gabriela Junqueira Calazans, Lorruan Alves Dos Santos, Augusto Mathias, Alexandre Grangeiro

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dulce FerrazPublic Health Analyst, Escola de Governo em Saúde, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz , Brasília , Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0443-3183
Marcia Thereza CoutoProfessor, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5233-4190
Eliana Miura ZucchiAssistant Professor at Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Católica de Santos , Santos , Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6234-1490
Gabriela Junqueira CalazansResearcher, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2414-1281
Lorruan Alves Dos SantosPhD Candidate, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6169-9455
Augusto MathiasPhD Candidate, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5896-9223
Alexandre GrangeiroResearcher, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Católica de Santos · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIDS-related stigma is a major hurdle to care and it hinders people from accessing HIV prevention methods, such as post-exposure prophylaxis. This study was designed to explore how AIDS-related stigma impacts the experience of using non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP) for HIV after sexual contact. Data were gathered in in-depth interviews with 59 people who voluntarily sought out nPEP in five public healthcare facilities in Brazil between 2015 and 2016. Data were analysed into three thematic categories: fear of being mistaken for a person living with HIV and AIDS (PLWHA); desire to hide particular features of one's sexual life; and experiences of stigmatising behaviour due to nPEP use. Based on the Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework, predominant manifestations of AIDS-related stigma in each category were analysed, as well as their intersections with gender- and sexuality-related stigmas. Results show that experiences of using nPEP are permeated by AIDS-related stigma, intersecting with sexuality- and gender-related stigmas. Stigma experiences are mainly perceived, anticipated and internalised; stigma practices include prejudice and stigmatising behaviours. Taking antiretrovirals (ARVs) led participants to the fear of being discriminated against as a PLWHA and having particular features of their sexual identities disclosed. Thus, hiding nPEP was strategic to protect from stigmatising behaviour. As ARV-based prevention technologies are scaled-up, interventions designed to tackle AIDS- and sexuality-related stigmas must be expanded in Brazil. Required interventions include public campaigns about nPEP, educational programmes in healthcare settings to offer adequate support to nPEP users and investments in stigma research and monitoring.

Indexed as

Post-Exposure ProphylaxisSocial StigmaAcquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAdolescentAdultBrazilFemaleHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchYoung AdultAIDSHIVpost-exposure prophylaxispreventionqualitative researchtigma

Identifiers

PMID31533555
PMCPMC7888039
OpenAlexW2970716592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.