ArticleAIDS care2020
Feasibility and acceptability of a psychosocial and adherence electronic patient reported outcomes (PROs) system at an HIV care center in southern India.
Article in AIDS care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Routine collection of patient-reported outcomes in HIV clinics: lessons learned after more than 130 000 assessments have been completed.AIDS (London, England) · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic patient reported outcome screening for mental illness and substance use disorders at HIV clinics in Alabama: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Risk Factors for Suboptimal Adherence Identified by Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessments in Routine HIV Care at 2 North American Clinics.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs), which consist of questionnaires administered directly to patients via handheld device or computer, allow for the routine and systematic capture of sensitive domains as well as longitudinal data on functional status, symptom severity, and physical and psychological well-being. There have been few examples of PROs in HIV care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and none in India. We conducted a study to assess the feasibility and acceptability of PROs at the Y.R. Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. We adapted an adherence and psychosocial questionnaire into an electronic PRO format and administered it to a convenience sample of 50 participants. Almost all participants indicated that the PRO questionnaire was easy to complete and understand (96%). The percentage who needed any staff help was 83% among illiterate participants but only 13% among literate participants (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.