Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31533397›Full record

ArticleGut and liver2020

Role of Serum Pepsinogen II and

Sung Min Baek, Nayoung Kim, Young Jae Kwon, Hye Seung Lee, Hyun Young Kim, Jaebong Lee, Hyuk Yoon, Cheol Min Shin, Young Soo Park, Dong Ho Lee

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut and liver, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Gut and liver · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. [Type A, Type B, and Non-atrophic Gastritis].The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The immune microenvironment in gastric adenocarcinoma.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sung Min BaekDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2778-2888
Nayoung KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9397-0406
Young Jae KwonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0532-2362
Hye Seung LeeDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1667-7986
Hyun Young KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3444-6022
Jaebong LeeDivision of Statistics in Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4882-081X
Hyuk YoonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2657-0349
Cheol Min ShinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2265-9845
Young Soo ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1893-7726
Dong Ho LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6376-410X
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: The utility of serum pepsinogen (sPG) I and the sPGI/II ratio as biomarkers for screening individuals with gastric cancer (GC) has not been established in Korea. The aim of this study was to define the role of sPG, especially sPGII, in GC screening. Methods: This study enrolled 2,940 subjects, including patients with GC (n=1,124) or gastric dysplasia (n=353) and controls (n=1,463). Tests to determine sPG levels and Results: The sPGI/II ratio was associated with the risk of gastric dysplasia and advanced-stage intestinal-type GC (IGC). In contrast, sPGII was associated with the risk of early-stage diffuse-type GC (DGC). Significantly higher risk was indicated by an sPGI/II ratio <3 for gastric dysplasia and advanced-stage IGC and by sPGII levels ≥20 µg/L for early-stage DGC. Positive HP status showed a stronger association with DGC than with IGC. When sPGII level and HP status were combined, the prevalence of DGC was higher in the ≥20 µg/L sPGII and HP-positive group. Age younger than 40 years was strongly related to early-stage DGC, especially in females (odds ratio, 21.00; p=0.006). Conclusions: sPGII ≥20 ng/mL and positive HP status suggest a risk of early-stage DGC, particularly in young adult females in South Korea.

Indexed as

Helicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriStomach NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPepsinogen CRepublic of KoreaPepsinogen CDiffuse typeHelicobacter pyloriPepsinogenStomach neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID31533397
PMCPMC7366145
OpenAlexW2973323203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.