Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31533292›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Move-It: A Cluster-Randomised Digital Worksite Exercise Intervention in China: Outcome and Process Evaluation.

Holly Blake, Betsy Lai, Emil Coman, Jonathan Houdmont, Amanda Griffiths

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04038658 (Move-It), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04038658 nacompletednot on this map

Move-It: A Cluster-randomised Digital Worksite Exercise Intervention in China: Outcome and Process Evaluation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NottinghamRan2013 to 2014Enrolled216ConditionsPhysical ActivityArmsMove-It
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Holly BlakeSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2HA, UK. holly.blake@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3080-2306
Betsy LaiSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. betsy.hk@gmail.com.
Emil ComanHealth Disparities Institute, University of Connecticut, Hartford, CT 06030-7030, USA. coman@uchc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1644-8219
Jonathan HoudmontSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. jonathan.houdmont@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5174-2619
Amanda GriffithsSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. amanda.griffiths@nottingham.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluate the outcomes and processes of a video and web-based worksite exercise intervention for sedentary office workers in China, in a 2-arm cluster-randomised wait-list control trial (

Indexed as

ExerciseOccupational HealthOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareWorkplaceAdultBeijingCluster AnalysisFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleSedentary BehaviorYoung Adultdigitalexercisehealth promotionphysical activitysedentaryworksite

Identifiers

PMID31533292
PMCPMC6766073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.