Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31533289›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2019

Blood-Based Treatments for Severe Dry Eye Disease: The Need of a Consensus.

Federico Bernabei, Matilde Roda, Marina Buzzi, Marco Pellegrini, Giuseppe Giannaccare, Piera Versura

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Allogeneic fresh frozen plasma eye drops for the treatment of ocular Graft-versus-Host disease: prospective open-label study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Autologous blood in the management of ocular surface disorders.World journal of experimental medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Long-term clinical outcome and satisfaction survey in patients with neurotrophic keratopathy after treatment with cenegermin eye drops or amniotic membrane transplantation.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Federico BernabeiOphthalmology Unit, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, S.Orsola-Malpighi Teaching Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy. federico.bernabei89@gmail.com.
Matilde RodaOphthalmology Unit, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, S.Orsola-Malpighi Teaching Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy. matilde.roda@hotmail.com.
Marina BuzziEmilia Romagna Cord Blood Bank-Transfusion Service, S.Orsola-Malpighi Teaching Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy. marina.buzzi@aosp.bo.it.
Marco PellegriniOphthalmology Unit, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, S.Orsola-Malpighi Teaching Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy. marco.pellegrini@hotmail.it.
Giuseppe GiannaccareDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy. giuseppe.giannaccare@unicz.it.ORCID 0000-0003-2617-0289
Piera VersuraOphthalmology Unit, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, S.Orsola-Malpighi Teaching Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy. piera.versura@unibo.it.ORCID 0000-0002-2951-5337
IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITMagna Graecia University · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of blood-based eye drops as therapy for various diseases of the ocular surface has become increasingly popular in ophthalmic practice during recent years. The rationale for their use is based on the promotion of cellular proliferation and migration thanks to the supply of metabolically active substances, in particular growth factors. Blood-derived eye drops have been used for the treatment of several ocular surface disorders, such as dry eye disease, corneal ulcer, persistent epithelial defect, neurotrophic keratitis, ocular surface burn, recurrent corneal erosion, and limbal stem-cell deficiency. Both autologous (from patients themselves) and heterologous (from adult donors or from cord blood sampled at birth)-derived products exist, and each source has specific pros and cons. Despite an extensive literature, several issues are still under debate and the aim of this manuscript is to review the indications, preparation methods and storage, characterization of content, rationale for clinical outcomes, patient stratification, length of treatment, and rationale for repeated treatments at disease relapse. A rationale based on a "5 Ws and 2 Hs" protocol is proposed as a way of thinking, with the attempt to clarify Who, Why, When, Where, What, and How to use these treatment options.

Indexed as

allogenic serumautologous serumcord blood serumdry eyeocular surface diseaseplatelet-derived eye drops

Identifiers

PMID31533289
PMCPMC6780616
OpenAlexW2974041047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.