Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31533267›Full record

ReviewViruses2019

Vector Competence: What Has Zika Virus Taught Us?

Sasha R Azar, Scott C Weaver

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dissecting Zika virus transmission byFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sasha R AzarDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 300 University Blvd, Galveston, TX 77555, USA. srazar@utmb.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9182-216X
Scott C WeaverDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 300 University Blvd, Galveston, TX 77555, USA. sweaver@utmb.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8016-8556

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unprecedented outbreak of Zika virus (ZIKV) infection in the Americas from 2015 to 2017 prompted the publication of a large body of vector competence data in a relatively short period of time. Although differences in vector competence as a result of disparities in mosquito populations and viral strains are to be expected, the limited competence of many populations of the urban mosquito vector,

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsArbovirusesHumansMosquito VectorsZika VirusZika Virus InfectionAedes aegyptiarbovirusFlavivirusesmosquitoesvector competenceZika virus

Identifiers

PMID31533267
PMCPMC6784050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.