Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31533172›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2019

Visualization of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Data for Older Adults Using Participatory Design.

Ryan Ahmed, Tammy Toscos, Romisa Rohani Ghahari, Richard J Holden, Elizabeth Martin, Shauna Wagner, Carly Daley, Amanda Coupe, Michael Mirro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Development of an efficient novel method for coronary artery disease prediction using machine learning and deep learning techniques.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Use of co-design methodology in the development of cardiovascular disease secondary prevention interventions: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Human factors and ergonomics methods for pharmacy research and clinical practice.Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ryan AhmedParkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States.
Tammy ToscosParkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States.
Romisa Rohani GhahariParkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States.
Richard J HoldenIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.
Elizabeth MartinParkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States.
Shauna WagnerParkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States.
Carly DaleyParkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States.
Amanda CoupeParkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States.
Michael MirroParkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with heart failure (HF) are commonly implanted with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices as part of their treatment. Presently, they cannot directly access the remote monitoring (RM) data generated from these devices, representing a missed opportunity for increased knowledge and engagement in care. However, electronic health data sharing can create information overload issues for both clinicians and patients, and some older patients may not be comfortable using the technology (i.e., computers and smartphones) necessary to access this data. To mitigate these problems, patients can be directly involved in the creation of data visualization tailored to their preferences and needs, allowing them to successfully interpret and act upon their health data. We held a participatory design (PD) session with seven adult patients with HF and CRT device implants, who were presently undergoing RM, along with two informal caregivers. Working in three teams, participants used drawing supplies and design cards to design a prototype for a patient-facing dashboard with which they could engage with their device data. Information that patients rated as a high priority for the "Main Dashboard" screen included average percent pacing with alerts for abnormal pacing, other device information such as battery life and recorded events, and information about who to contact with for data-related questions. Preferences for inclusion in an "Additional Information" display included a daily pacing chart, health tips, aborted shocks, a symptom list, and a journal. These results informed the creation of an actual dashboard prototype which was later evaluated by both patients and clinicians. Additionally, important insights were gleaned regarding the involvement of older patients in PD for health technology.

Indexed as

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy DevicesPatient ParticipationRemote Sensing TechnologyAgedElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID31533172
PMCPMC6751067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.