ArticleJDR clinical and translational research2020
An International Working Definition for Quality of Oral Healthcare.
Article in JDR clinical and translational research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A Systematic Literature Review of Quality Management Initiatives in Dental Clinics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Dutch oral health care quality measures: a modified Delphi study.International dental journal · 2020Pooled it
- Reconsidering how we define quality: insights from the co-development of an actionable definition of oral healthcare quality,mntion.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- Implementation and Evaluation of the OWLL Intervention to Improve the Quality and Safety of Pediatric Dental Sedation: A Mixed-Methods Approach.Journal of patient safety · 2026Article
- Whose Responsibility Is It? A Community-Level Situational Analysis of Oral Health Care in Amsterdam.JDR clinical and translational research · 2026Article
- Design and Development of an Intervention to Improve the Quality and Safety of Pediatric Dental Sedation: A Human-Centered Design Approach.Journal of patient safety · 2025Article
- Pressing issues for oral care quality improvement: findings from the EU DELIVER project.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Deliberative Improvement of Oral Care Quality: The Horizon Europe DELIVER Project.JDR clinical and translational research · 2024Article
- Measuring the quality of dental care among privately insured children in the United States.Health services research · 2022Article
- Association between local spatial accessibility of dental care services and dental care quality.BMC oral health · 2021Article
- [Global oral health in the international health policy spotlight-challenges and new opportunities for sustainable improvement].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2021Review
- Role of Dentistry in Global Health: Challenges and Research Priorities.Journal of dental research · 2021Article
- Planning the oral health workforce: Time for innovation.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess and improve the quality of oral healthcare, we must first agree on what constitutes good care. Currently there is no internationally accepted definition for quality of oral healthcare. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to establish a working definition for quality of oral healthcare that would help to advance further improvements in the field of quality improvement in oral healthcare. The development of the working definition included a 3-step approach: 1) literature screening; 2) expert-based compilation of an initial list of topics, leaning on the National Academy of Medicine framework for quality of care; and 3) a World Café with voting, which took place during the annual general meeting of the International Association for Dental Research in 2018. Following this approach, the collective intelligence of involved participants yielded a comprehensive list of items, prioritized by relevance. The resulting working definition comprises 7 domains—patient safety, effectiveness, efficiency, patient-centeredness, equitability, timeliness, access to care—and 30 items, which together characterize quality of oral healthcare. This aspirational working definition provides the potential to facilitate further conversations and activities aiming at quality improvement in oral healthcare. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: This special communication describes the development of a working definition for quality of oral healthcare. The findings of this study are intended to raise awareness of the relevance of quality improvement initiatives in oral healthcare. The working definition described here has the potential to facilitate further conversations and activities aiming at quality improvement in oral healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.