Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31532871›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2020

Recommendations to improve patient-centred care for ductal carcinoma in situ: Qualitative focus groups with women.

Bryanna B Nyhof, Frances C Wright, Nicole J Look Hong, Gary Groot, Lucy Helyer, Pamela Meiers, May Lynn Quan, Nancy N Baxter, Robin Urquhart, Rebecca Warburton and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Quality of life issues in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Overcoming Barriers in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Management: From Overtreatment to Optimal Treatment.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Recommendations to improve patient-centred care for ductal carcinoma in situ: Qualitative focus groups with women.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bryanna B NyhofToronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Frances C WrightSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nicole J Look HongSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Gary GrootUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Lucy HelyerDalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Pamela MeiersUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
May Lynn QuanUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Nancy N BaxterUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Robin UrquhartDalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Rebecca WarburtonUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Anna R GagliardiToronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5721-809X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-centred care (PCC) improves health-care experiences and outcomes. Women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and clinicians have reported communication difficulties. Little prior research has studied how to improve communication and PCC for DCIS.

objectiveThis study explored how to achieve PCC for DCIS.

designCanadian women treated for DCIS from five provinces participated in semi-structured focus groups based on a 6-domain cancer-specific PCC framework to discuss communication about DCIS. Data were analysed using constant comparative technique. SETTING AND

participantsThirty-five women aged 30 to 86 participated in five focus groups at five hospitals.

resultsWomen said their clinicians used multiple approaches for fostering a healing relationship; however, most described an absence of desired information or behaviour to exchange information, respond to emotions, manage uncertainty, make decisions and enable self-management. Most women were confused by terminology, offered little information about the risks of progression/recurrence, uninformed about treatment benefits and risks, frustrated with lack of engagement in decision making, given little information about follow-up plans or self-care advice, and received no acknowledgement or offer of emotional support. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsBy comparing the accounts of women with DCIS to a PCC framework, we identified limitations and inconsistencies in women's lived experience of communication about DCIS, and approaches by which clinicians can more consistently achieve PCC for DCIS. Future research should develop and evaluate informational tools to support PCC for DCIS.

Indexed as

CommunicationDecision MakingPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCanadaCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingEmotionsFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CarePatient Education as Topiccommunicationdecision makingductal carcinoma in situpatient-centred care

Identifiers

PMID31532871
PMCPMC6978860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.