Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31532786›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Young adults' perceptions of using wearables, social media and other technologies to detect worsening mental health: A qualitative study.

Lindsay H Dewa, Mary Lavelle, Katy Pickles, Caroline Kalorkoti, Jack Jaques, Sofia Pappa, Paul Aylin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Youth engagement in mental health research: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lindsay H DewaSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8359-8834
Mary LavelleNIHR Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Katy PicklesThe McPin Foundation, Young People's Network, London, United Kingdom.
Caroline KalorkotiThe McPin Foundation, Young People's Network, London, United Kingdom.
Jack JaquesThe McPin Foundation, Young People's Network, London, United Kingdom.
Sofia PappaWest London NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Paul AylinSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
McPin Foundation · GBNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre · GBImperial College London · GBWest London Mental Health NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTechnological interventions may help support and improve mental health. However young peoples' perspectives on using different technologies to detect deteriorating mental health in those already diagnosed with a mental health condition is lacking. The study aim was to explore the perspectives of young patients on the feasibility and acceptability of using wearables, social media and technologies to detect mental health deterioration.

methodsThe study was co-produced with young adults with past mental health difficulties. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with young adults with a severe mental health condition in a private room at a community mental health site. Data was triangulated by comparing codes and ideas across the two co-researchers and two researchers over two virtual meetings. Themes were finalised and presented in a thematic map.

resultsSixteen participants were interviewed (81% female). There were four main themes: dealing with mental health symptoms, signs of mental health deterioration, technology concerns and technological applications to identify worsening mental health. Wearables and mobile apps were considered acceptable and feasible to detect mental health deterioration in real-time if they could measure changes in sleep patterns, mood or activity levels as signs of deterioration. Getting help earlier was deemed essential particularly in reference to dissatisfaction with the current non-technological mental health services. However, patients identified issues to consider before implementation including practicality, safeguarding and patient preference.

conclusionWearables and mobile apps could be viable technological options to help detect deterioration in young people in order to intervene early and avoid delay in accessing mental health services. However, immediate action following detection is required for the patient to trust and use the intervention.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMental HealthMental Health ServicesMobile ApplicationsQualitative ResearchSocial MediaTechnologyWearable Electronic DevicesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31532786
PMCPMC6750581
OpenAlexW2973449443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.