ArticleJAMA network open2019
Physician Perceptions of the Use of Social Media for Recruitment of Patients in Cancer Clinical Trials.
Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Social Media in Heart Failure: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.Current cardiology reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Enhancing Efficiency and Reach Using Facebook to Recruit Breast Cancer Survivors for a Telephone-Based Supportive Care Randomized Trial During the COVID-19 Pandemic.JCO oncology practice · 2023Trial
- A survey of patients with laryngotracheal stenosis on future clinical trial design.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2022Trial
- A unified framework for pre-screening and screening tools in oncology clinical trials.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Disparities in cancer clinical trials information-seeking: Findings from the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service.Patient education and counseling · 2024Article
- Challenges to Recruiting Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in Clinical Chemoprevention Trials.Cancers · 2023Article
- Methods and perceptions of success for patient recruitment in decentralized clinical studies.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Review
- Perception of social media behaviour among medical students, residents and medical specialists.Perspectives on medical education · 2021Article
- Social Media and Clinical Research in Dermatology.Current dermatology reports · 2021Review
- Investigator Use of Social Media for Recruitment of Patients for Cancer Clinical Trials.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Clinical Trials in the Era of Digital Engagement: A SWOG Call to Action.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2020Article
- Internal Medicine Physicians and Social media: Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Social media campaigns have been successfully implemented in nontherapeutic trials. However, evidence to support their utility in cancer therapeutic trials is limited. Objective: To examine physician attitudes toward and perceptions of social media use for therapeutic trial recruitment of patients with cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study engaged 44 physicians (24 academic based and 20 community based) at the main academic and 6 affiliated community sites of City of Hope in Duarte, California. Semistructured interviews were conducted in person or by telephone from March to June 2018. An interview guide was developed to explore perceptions of social media use for accrual of cancer therapeutic trials. Responses were recorded digitally and transcribed. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Physicians' perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of using social media for clinical trial recruitment, strategies to improve uptake of social media in clinical trials, and the barriers and facilitators to social media use for professional purposes in general. Results: Of the 44 participants, 16 (36%) were women, 30 (68%) had more than 10 years of practice experience, 24 (55%) practiced in academia, and 20 (45%) practiced in the community. Physicians most commonly cited increased trial awareness and visibility as an advantage of using social media for trial recruitment. Cited disadvantages were increased administrative burden and risk of misinformation. Physicians also reported a need for institutional-level interventions (eg, restructuring of clinical trial offices to include personnel with social media expertise), increased evidence-based approaches to social media use, and more physician training on the use of social media. Perceived facilitators to professional social media use were networking and education; barriers included lack of time and lack of evidence of benefit. Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative study, physicians recognized the benefits of using social media for clinical trial recruitment but noted that barriers, including increased administrative burden, increased time, and the risk of misinformation, remain. Future interventions to address these concerns are a required first step in increasing digital engagement for clinical trial accrual purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.