Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31532517›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2019

Physician Perceptions of the Use of Social Media for Recruitment of Patients in Cancer Clinical Trials.

Mina S Sedrak, Virginia Sun, Jennifer Liu, Kevin George, Andrew R Wong, William Dale, Don S Dizon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Social Media and Clinical Research in Dermatology.Current dermatology reports · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mina S SedrakDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, California.
Virginia SunDepartment of Population Science, City of Hope, Duarte, California.
Jennifer LiuDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, California.
Kevin GeorgeDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, California.
Andrew R WongDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, California.
William DaleDepartment of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, California.
Don S DizonLifespan Cancer Institute, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Funding

Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA001727 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER · PI MORTIMER, JOANNE E. · 1992 to 2024
$14.6M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA001727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Social media campaigns have been successfully implemented in nontherapeutic trials. However, evidence to support their utility in cancer therapeutic trials is limited. Objective: To examine physician attitudes toward and perceptions of social media use for therapeutic trial recruitment of patients with cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study engaged 44 physicians (24 academic based and 20 community based) at the main academic and 6 affiliated community sites of City of Hope in Duarte, California. Semistructured interviews were conducted in person or by telephone from March to June 2018. An interview guide was developed to explore perceptions of social media use for accrual of cancer therapeutic trials. Responses were recorded digitally and transcribed. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Physicians' perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of using social media for clinical trial recruitment, strategies to improve uptake of social media in clinical trials, and the barriers and facilitators to social media use for professional purposes in general. Results: Of the 44 participants, 16 (36%) were women, 30 (68%) had more than 10 years of practice experience, 24 (55%) practiced in academia, and 20 (45%) practiced in the community. Physicians most commonly cited increased trial awareness and visibility as an advantage of using social media for trial recruitment. Cited disadvantages were increased administrative burden and risk of misinformation. Physicians also reported a need for institutional-level interventions (eg, restructuring of clinical trial offices to include personnel with social media expertise), increased evidence-based approaches to social media use, and more physician training on the use of social media. Perceived facilitators to professional social media use were networking and education; barriers included lack of time and lack of evidence of benefit. Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative study, physicians recognized the benefits of using social media for clinical trial recruitment but noted that barriers, including increased administrative burden, increased time, and the risk of misinformation, remain. Future interventions to address these concerns are a required first step in increasing digital engagement for clinical trial accrual purposes.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchNeoplasmsPatient SelectionSocial MediaAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical Trials as TopicHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicPerceptionPhysiciansQualitative ResearchResearch PersonnelRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID31532517
PMCPMC6751756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.