Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31532494›Full record

SynthesisNutrition reviews2019

Iron supplementation in preterm and low-birth-weight infants: a systematic review of intervention studies.

Elaine K McCarthy, Eugene M Dempsey, Mairead E Kiely

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrition reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06555315 (Pilot Non-inferiority Study Investigating Daily Versus Every Other Day Dosing of Oral Iron in Premature Infants.), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06555315 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Non-inferiority Study Investigating Daily Versus Every Other Day Dosing of Oral Iron in Premature Infants.

TypeinterventionalSponsorCHRISTUS HealthRan2024 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsVery Low Birth Weight Infant, Premature Infants, Anemia of Prematurity, Iron Deficiency, Anaemia in ChildrenArms6 mg/kg of oral iron as ferrous sulfate administered every other day., 6 mg/kg of oral iron as ferrous sulfate administered every day.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of anemia of prematurity (2025)].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Decreasing packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions in neonates through quality improvement.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elaine K McCarthyINFANT Research Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Republic of Ireland.
Eugene M DempseyINFANT Research Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Republic of Ireland.
Mairead E KielyINFANT Research Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Republic of Ireland.
Infant · IEUniversity College Cork · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextEnteral iron supplementation in preterm infants is recommended to supply sufficient iron for growth and development without increasing the risk of iron overload. However, the current recommendations date from 2010 and are based on limited evidence.

objectiveThis systematic review aimed to investigate the effects of enteral iron supplementation on iron status, growth, neurological development, and adverse clinical outcomes in preterm (<37 weeks' gestation) and low-birth-weight (LBW, <2500 g) infants. DATA SOURCES: The PubMed/Medline and Cochrane Library databases were searched to 31 October 2018. DATA EXTRACTION: Of the 684 records identified, 27 articles, describing 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) plus 4 nonrandomized interventions, were included. Using the Cochrane Collaboration's criteria, study quality was found to be poor to fair overall.

resultsMost articles (23/27) reported iron status indices; supplementation for ≥8 weeks resulted in increased hemoglobin and ferritin concentrations and a reduction in iron deficiency and anemia. No article reported on iron overload. Growth-related parameters reported in 12 articles were not affected by supplementation. Among the 7 articles on neurological development, a positive effect on behavior at 3.5 and 7 years was observed in one Swedish RCT. No association was found between supplementation and adverse clinical outcomes in the 9 articles reporting on studies in which such data was collected.

conclusionsLong-term iron supplementation appears to result in improved iron status and a reduction in iron deficiency and anemia in preterm and LBW infants. However, high-quality evidence regarding the long-term effects of supplementation on functional health outcomes is lacking. Iron overload has largely been ignored. Well-designed, long-term, dose-response RCTs are required to ascertain the optimal dose and delivery method for the provision of dietary iron in preterm infants, with consideration of short- and long-term health effects. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42018085214.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, PrematureClinical Trials as TopicHumansInfant, NewbornIron, DietaryIron, Dietarygrowthiron supplementationlow birth weight infantsneurological developmentpreterm infants

Identifiers

PMID31532494
PMCPMC6888764
OpenAlexW2973851930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.