Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31532248›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2019

Correlates of Walking for Travel in Seven European Cities: The PASTA Project.

Mireia Gascon, Thomas Götschi, Audrey de Nazelle, Esther Gracia, Albert Ambròs, Sandra Márquez, Oriol Marquet, Ione Avila-Palencia, Christian Brand, Francesco Iacorossi and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Impact of the Built Environment and Social Environment on Physical Activity: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Mireia GasconBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Thomas GötschiEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Audrey de NazelleCentre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Esther GraciaBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Albert AmbròsBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Sandra MárquezBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Oriol MarquetBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Ione Avila-PalenciaBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Christian BrandTransport Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Francesco IacorossiAgenzia Roma Servizi per la Mobilità, Rome, Italy.
Elisabeth RaserInstitute for Transport Studies, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Mailin Gaupp-BerghausenInstitute for Transport Studies, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Evi DonsCentre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Michelle LaeremansFlemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
Sonja KahlmeierPhysical Activity and Health Unit, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Julian SánchezCentre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Regine GerikeInstitute of Transport Planning and Road Traffic, Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Esther Anaya-BoigCentre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Luc Int PanisFlemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
Mark NieuwenhuijsenBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S019669/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough walking for travel can help in reaching the daily recommended levels of physical activity, we know relatively little about the correlates of walking for travel in the European context.

objectiveWithin the framework of the European Physical Activity through Sustainable Transport Approaches (PASTA) project, we aimed to explore the correlates of walking for travel in European cities.

methodsThe same protocol was applied in seven European cities. Using a web-based questionnaire, we collected information on total minutes of walking per week, individual characteristics, mobility behavior, and attitude (

resultsLiving in high-density residential areas with richness of facilities and density of public transport stations was associated with increased walking for travel, whereas the same characteristics at the work/study area were less strongly associated with the outcome when the residential and work/study environments were entered in the model jointly. A walk-friendly social environment was associated with walking for travel. All three factors describing different opinions about walking (ranging from good to bad) were associated with increased minutes of walking per week, although the importance given to certain criteria to choose a mode of transport provided different results according to the criteria. DISCUSSION: The present study supports findings from previous research regarding the role of the built environment in the promotion of walking for travel and provides new findings to help in achieving sustainable, healthy, livable, and walkable cities. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4603.

Indexed as

TravelCitiesEnvironment DesignEuropeExerciseGeographic Information SystemsHumansPedestriansSocioeconomic FactorsWalking

Identifiers

PMID31532248
PMCPMC6792377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.