Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31532049›Full record

ReviewGlobal change biology2020

Characterising the biophysical, economic and social impacts of soil carbon sequestration as a greenhouse gas removal technology.

Alasdair J Sykes, Michael Macleod, Vera Eory, Robert M Rees, Florian Payen, Vasilis Myrgiotis, Mathew Williams, Saran Sohi, Jon Hillier, Dominic Moran and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global change biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Weaponising microbes for peace.Microbial biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Alasdair J SykesScotland's Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6490-1006
Michael MacleodScotland's Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, UK.
Vera EoryScotland's Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, UK.
Robert M ReesScotland's Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, UK.
Florian PayenScotland's Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, UK.
Vasilis MyrgiotisSchool of Geosciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Mathew WilliamsSchool of Geosciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Saran SohiSchool of Geosciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Jon HillierGlobal Academy of Agriculture and Food Security, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Dominic MoranGlobal Academy of Agriculture and Food Security, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
David A C ManningSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon Tyne, UK.
Pietro GoglioSchool of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield University, Bedford, UK.
Michele SeghettaSchool of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield University, Bedford, UK.
Adrian WilliamsSchool of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield University, Bedford, UK.
Jim HarrisSchool of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield University, Bedford, UK.
Marta DondiniInstitute of Biological & Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Jack WaltonInstitute of Biological & Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Joanna HouseCabot Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Pete SmithInstitute of Biological & Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3784-1124

Funding

Natural Environment Research Council NE/P019463/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To limit warming to well below 2°C, most scenario projections rely on greenhouse gas removal technologies (GGRTs); one such GGRT uses soil carbon sequestration (SCS) in agricultural land. In addition to their role in mitigating climate change, SCS practices play a role in delivering agroecosystem resilience, climate change adaptability and food security. Environmental heterogeneity and differences in agricultural practices challenge the practical implementation of SCS, and our analysis addresses the associated knowledge gap. Previous assessments have focused on global potentials, but there is a need among policymakers to operationalise SCS. Here, we assess a range of practices already proposed to deliver SCS, and distil these into a subset of specific measures. We provide a multidisciplinary summary of the barriers and potential incentives towards practical implementation of these measures. First, we identify specific practices with potential for both a positive impact on SCS at farm level and an uptake rate compatible with global impact. These focus on: (a) optimising crop primary productivity (e.g. nutrient optimisation, pH management, irrigation); (b) reducing soil disturbance and managing soil physical properties (e.g. improved rotations, minimum till); (c) minimising deliberate removal of C or lateral transport via erosion processes (e.g. support measures, bare fallow reduction); (d) addition of C produced outside the system (e.g. organic manure amendments, biochar addition); (e) provision of additional C inputs within the cropping system (e.g. agroforestry, cover cropping). We then consider economic and non-cost barriers and incentives for land managers implementing these measures, along with the potential externalised impacts of implementation. This offers a framework and reference point for holistic assessment of the impacts of SCS. Finally, we summarise and discuss the ability of extant scientific approaches to quantify the technical potential and externalities of SCS measures, and the barriers and incentives to their implementation in global agricultural systems.

Indexed as

Greenhouse GasesAgricultureCarbonCarbon SequestrationGreenhouse EffectSocial ChangeSoilCarbonGreenhouse GasesSoil4 per milleagriculturegreenhouse gas removalnegative emissionssoil carbon sequestrationsoil organic carbon

Identifiers

PMID31532049
PMCPMC7079085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.