Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31532048›Full record

SynthesisJournal of nursing management2020

Nursing home staff experiences of implementing mentorship programmes: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.

Lulu Liao, Lily Dongxia Xiao, Huijing Chen, Xin Yin Wu, Yinan Zhao, Mingyue Hu, Hengyu Hu, Hui Li, Xiufen Yang, Hui Feng

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of nursing management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lulu LiaoXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6914-6628
Lily Dongxia XiaoXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Huijing ChenXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xin Yin WuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Xiangya School of Public health, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yinan ZhaoXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Mingyue HuXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Hengyu HuXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Hui LiThird Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiufen YangXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Hui FengXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Funding

Aged Care Clinical Mentoring Model of Change in Nursing Homes in China: A Cluster RCT 17-268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo determine nursing home staff experiences in mentorship programmes, and staff perceptions of the enablers and barriers to implement mentorship programmes.

backgroundMentorship programmes are perceived as playing an important role in improving the quality of care in nursing homes. However, little is known about research evidence across the global about staff's experiences in the programmes.

methodsA search for studies published from the earliest available date to April 2019 was undertaken. Two reviewers performed data extraction and an appraisal of eight studies using tools from the Joanna Briggs Institute. A pragmatic meta-aggregative approach was applied to synthesise the findings. The qualitative research that was included was analysed to identify 63 findings that were organised into 12 categories and combined into three syntheses.

resultsThe implementation of effective mentorship programmes is influenced by three factors: mentor capability, opportunity in the mentorship programmes, and motivation in the mentorship programmes.

conclusionsThere are a number of studies of nursing home staff experiences of mentorship programmes. However, systematic reviews that synthesise findings in this field are lacking. It is crucial to tailor the programme design to suit each unique nursing home care setting. We identified barriers and enablers, and learned that no barriers are insurmountable. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Findings will inform nurse managers of an ideal environment for the implementation of a successful mentorship programme. Nursing homes need to establish and sustain mentorship programmes to help improve workforce capacity in delivering high-quality care for residents.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchHumansMentoringNursing Staff, HospitalProgram Developmentmentorshipnursing homequalitative meta-synthesissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31532048
PMCPMC7328728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.