Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31531968›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology and bioengineering2020

Strategy for achieving standardized bone models.

Mikhael Hadida, David Marchat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Why Animal Experiments Are Still Indispensable in Bone Research: A Statement by the European Calcified Tissue Society.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bone Regeneration and Oxidative Stress: An Updated Overview.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Strategy for achieving standardized bone models.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mikhael HadidaMines Saint-Etienne, Univ Lyon, Univ Jean Monnet, INSERM, U 1059 Sainbiose, Centre CIS, Saint-Etienne, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8976-3981
David MarchatMines Saint-Etienne, Univ Lyon, Univ Jean Monnet, INSERM, U 1059 Sainbiose, Centre CIS, Saint-Etienne, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3052-0029

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliably producing functional in vitro organ models, such as organ-on-chip systems, has the potential to considerably advance biology research, drug development time, and resource efficiency. However, despite the ongoing major progress in the field, three-dimensional bone tissue models remain elusive. In this review, we specifically investigate the control of perfusion flow effects as the missing link between isolated culture systems and scientifically exploitable bone models and propose a roadmap toward this goal.

Indexed as

BioreactorsBone and BonesModels, BiologicalTissue EngineeringAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesEquipment DesignHumansLab-On-A-Chip DevicesTissue Array Analysisbonein vitro 3D modelsperfusion bioreactortissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID31531968
PMCPMC6915912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.