Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31531910›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie2020

Prediction of nutrient digestibility in grower-finisher pigs based on faecal microbiota composition.

Lisanne M G Verschuren, Dirkjan Schokker, Rob Bergsma, Alfons J M Jansman, Francesc Molist, Mario P L Calus

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microbial and Genomic Information Synergistically Contribute to Predicting Swine Performance Across Production Systems.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genetics of digestive efficiency in growing pigs fed a conventional or a high-fibre diet.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Prediction of nutrient digestibility in grower-finisher pigs based on faecal microbiota composition.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lisanne M G VerschurenTopigs Norsvin Research Center B.V., Beuningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5428-4174
Dirkjan SchokkerWageningen Livestock Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6082-7227
Rob BergsmaTopigs Norsvin Research Center B.V., Beuningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8254-5535
Alfons J M JansmanWageningen Livestock Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5104-8261
Francesc MolistSchothorst Feed Research B.V., Lelystad, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7915-3098
Mario P L CalusAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3213-704X
Wageningen University & Research · NLTopigs Norsvin (Netherlands) · NLSchothorst Feed Research · NL

Funding

Breed&Feed4Food BO-22.04-010-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiota play an important role in total tract nutrient digestion, especially when fibrous diets are fed to pigs. This study aimed to use metagenomics to predict faecal nutrient digestibility in grower-finisher pigs. The study design consisted of 160 three-way crossbreed grower-finisher pigs (80 female and 80 male) which were either fed a diet based on corn/soybean meal or a more fibrous diet based on wheat/barley/by-products. On the day before slaughter, faecal samples were collected and used to determine faecal digestibility of dry matter, ash, organic matter, crude protein, crude fat, crude fibre and non-starch polysaccharides. The faecal samples were also sequenced for the 16S hypervariable region of bacteria (V3/V4) to profile the faecal microbiome. With these data, we calculated the between-animal variation in faecal nutrient digestibility associated with variation in the faecal microbiome, that is the "microbiability". The microbiability values were significantly greater than zero for dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, crude fibre and non-starch polysaccharides, ranging from 0.58 to 0.93, as well as for crude fat with a value of 0.37, but not significantly different from zero for ash. Using leave-one-out cross-validation, we estimated the accuracy of predicting digestibility values of individual pigs based on their faecal microbiota composition. The accuracies of prediction for crude fat and ash digestibility were virtually 0, and for the other nutrients, the accuracies ranged from 0.42 to 0.63. In conclusion, the faecal microbiota composition gave high microbiability values for faecal digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, crude fibre and non-starch polysaccharides. The accuracies of prediction are relatively low if the interest is in precisely predicting faecal nutrient digestibility of individual pigs, but are promising from the perspective of ranking animals in a genetic selection context.

Indexed as

DigestionMicrobiotaAnimalsFecesFemaleMaleNutrientsPhenotypeSwineNutrientsdigestionmetagenomicsmicrobiotapig

Identifiers

PMID31531910
PMCPMC6972985
OpenAlexW2974499779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.